PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TP05.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TP05.L achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return.


TP05.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.94%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.38%-6.85%-0.44%-6.21%8.40%6.35%-1.65%-1.59%3.26%-4.52%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%4.28%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TP05.L and IITU.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.12

The correlation between TP05.L and IITU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (5 years) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TP05.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TP05.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.44

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

3.17

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

8.17

-8.24

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TP05.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TP05.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TP05.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

2.71

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

1.16

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

1.23

-1.29

Drawdowns

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TP05.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TP05.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TP05.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-28.03%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-16.76%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-28.03%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-28.03%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.31%

-2.89%

-19.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-5.14%

-5.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

6.51%

-2.63%

Volatility

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) is 3.02%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that TP05.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TP05.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

7.01%

-3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

14.45%

-9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

19.60%

-11.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

21.94%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

21.31%

-12.32%

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TP05.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TP05.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

TP05.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.06%0.06%0.07%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TP05.L and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TP05.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TP05.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.

TP05.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. TP05.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TP05.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TP05.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer