PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TP05.L vs. IBCI.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TP05.L is traded in GBp, while IBCI.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBCI.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TP05.L achieves a 2.09% return, which is significantly higher than IBCI.L's -0.01% return.


TP05.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.41%
6M
1.44%
YTD
2.09%
1Y
3.34%
3Y*
3.89%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*

IBCI.L

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.22%
6M
-0.13%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.09%-1.22%5.72%-1.34%8.77%6.75%1.37%1.64%3.23%-26.73%
IBCI.L
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.01%6.03%-4.55%3.48%-4.33%-0.79%8.45%1.18%-1.05%10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TP05.L and IBCI.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2017

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between TP05.L and IBCI.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCI.L
IBCI.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
IBCI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TP05.LIBCI.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.04

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.37

+0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.85

0.80

+1.05

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TP05.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the IBCI.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TP05.L and IBCI.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TP05.L drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCI.L drawdown of -30.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TP05.L and IBCI.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TP05.LIBCI.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-30.47%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-3.33%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.54%

-14.28%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.95%

-14.28%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

-8.52%

+3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.83%

-10.76%

-5.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

1.54%

+0.26%

Volatility

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) is 1.21%, while iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IBCI.L) has a volatility of 1.41%. This indicates that TP05.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TP05.LIBCI.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.41%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.57%

3.72%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.95%

4.90%

+2.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.39%

11.49%

-3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.24%

11.76%

-0.52%

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TP05.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCI.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TP05.L vs. IBCI.L - Dividend Comparison

TP05.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, while IBCI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IBCI.L
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.88%6.05%6.10%5.27%0.34%0.36%3.26%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


TP05.L and IBCI.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCI.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCI.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TP05.L.

TP05.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while IBCI.L tracks BBG Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (EUR). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TP05.L and 0.09% for IBCI.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TP05.L and IBCI.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer