PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TP05.L vs. GILG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TP05.L is traded in GBp, while GILG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the GILG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TP05.L achieves a -0.38% return, which is significantly lower than GILG.L's 1.51% return.


TP05.L

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.38%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
-0.27%
3Y*
-3.94%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*

GILG.L

1D
0.09%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.28%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
-1.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.38%-6.85%-0.44%-6.21%8.40%6.35%-2.69%
GILG.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.51%4.23%-0.86%3.12%-18.45%5.19%2.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TP05.L and GILG.L is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2020

0.00

The correlation between TP05.L and GILG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TP05.L vs. GILG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TP05.L
TP05.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TP05.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TP05.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TP05.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
TP05.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TP05.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GILG.L
GILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) and iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TP05.LGILG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.15

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.03

1.71

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.07

4.72

-4.79

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TP05.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the GILG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TP05.L and GILG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TP05.LGILG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.86

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

-0.19

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

-0.12

+0.06

Drawdowns

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TP05.L drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, roughly equal to the maximum GILG.L drawdown of -24.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TP05.L and GILG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TP05.LGILG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-24.23%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.76%

-2.43%

-5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-5.52%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

-24.23%

+0.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.31%

-13.44%

-8.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-13.12%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.88%

0.88%

+3.00%

Volatility

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TP05.L) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (GILG.L) at 1.48%. This indicates that TP05.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GILG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TP05.LGILG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.02%

1.48%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.23%

3.40%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.68%

4.84%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.80%

7.79%

+1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.99%

7.54%

+1.45%

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TP05.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GILG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TP05.L vs. GILG.L - Dividend Comparison

TP05.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than GILG.L's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
GILG.L
iShares Global Inflation Linked Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.98%0.96%0.87%0.79%0.72%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TP05.L
iShares USD TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.06%0.06%0.07%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TP05.L and GILG.L have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TP05.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TP05.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GILG.L.

TP05.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while GILG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TP05.L and 0.20% for GILG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TP05.L and GILG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer