TOPW vs. NFLW
TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TOPW is passively managed, while NFLW is actively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TOPW vs. NFLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than NFLW's -26.22% return.
TOPW
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFLW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -20.56%
- YTD
- -26.22%
- 1Y
- -48.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW vs. NFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 2.38% | -1.33% |
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | -26.22% | -28.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPW and NFLW is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOPW vs. NFLW — Risk / Return Rank
TOPW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NFLW
TOPW vs. NFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TOPW | NFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.76 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOPW vs. NFLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum NFLW drawdown of -55.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and NFLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPW | NFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -55.10% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -53.01% | +38.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.31% | -29.35% | +16.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.82% | — |
Volatility
TOPW vs. NFLW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOPW | NFLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 31.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.51% | 40.96% | -13.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 40.30% | -12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.51% | 40.30% | -12.79% |
TOPW vs. NFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TOPW and NFLW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TOPW vs. NFLW - Dividend Comparison
TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 48.21%, less than NFLW's 82.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NFLW Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF | 82.21% | 38.89% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 48.21% | 21.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOPW and NFLW have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOPW and NFLW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 82.21%, compared with 48.21% for TOPW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Roundhill.
Find the right allocation for TOPW and NFLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer