PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOPW vs. NFLW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOPW vs. NFLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly higher than NFLW's -16.78% return.


TOPW

1D
-1.52%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.71%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFLW

1D
-2.48%
1M
-12.48%
YTD
-16.78%
6M
-26.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPW vs. NFLW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TOPW
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF
7.71%-2.47%
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
-16.78%-30.68%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPW and NFLW is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOPW vs. NFLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF (NFLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOPW vs. NFLW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOPWNFLWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

-1.05

+1.31

Drawdowns

TOPW vs. NFLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum NFLW drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and NFLW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOPWNFLWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.87%

-50.73%

+20.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

-47.00%

+36.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-26.84%

+13.96%

Volatility

TOPW vs. NFLW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOPWNFLWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

40.34%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

40.34%

-12.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.36%

40.34%

-12.98%

TOPW vs. NFLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TOPW and NFLW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

TOPW vs. NFLW - Dividend Comparison

TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.33%, less than NFLW's 73.24% yield.


PositionTTM2025
NFLW
Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF
73.24%38.89%
TOPW
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF
40.33%21.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOPW and NFLW have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOPW and NFLW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

NFLW has the higher dividend yield at 73.24%, compared with 40.33% for TOPW.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and Roundhill.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOPW and NFLW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer