TOPW vs. LQTI
TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. TOPW is passively managed, while LQTI is actively managed. At 0.14, their price movements are largely independent. TOPW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
TOPW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a -7.21% return, which is significantly lower than LQTI's 0.32% return.
TOPW
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -0.70%
- YTD
- -7.21%
- 6M
- -21.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 8.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | -7.21% | -2.47% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.32% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPW and LQTI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2025 | 0.14 |
TOPW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TOPW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOPW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
TOPW
LQTI
TOPW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TOPW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 1.01 | -1.55 |
Drawdowns
TOPW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and LQTI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -3.41% | -26.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.48% | -1.28% | -21.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.05% | -0.79% | -12.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility
TOPW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TOPW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.26% | 5.95% | +23.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 6.09% | +23.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.26% | 6.09% | +23.17% |
Dividends
TOPW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.61%, more than LQTI's 9.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 37.61% | 21.52% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.00% | 7.01% |