TOPW vs. ARMW
TOPW (Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF) and ARMW (Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill Investments. TOPW is passively managed, while ARMW is actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
TOPW vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 297.09% return.
TOPW
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- -11.24%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMW
- 1D
- -13.02%
- 1M
- 22.00%
- YTD
- 297.09%
- 6M
- 286.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOPW vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | -4.42% | -9.73% |
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 297.09% | -41.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TOPW and ARMW is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TOPW vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TOPW vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and ARMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TOPW | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.87% | -48.47% | +18.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.15% | -20.08% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -25.29% | +12.28% |
Volatility
TOPW vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TOPW | ARMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.87% | 94.74% | -66.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 94.74% | -66.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.87% | 94.74% | -66.87% |
TOPW vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TOPW and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
TOPW vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison
TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.37%, more than ARMW's 25.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMW Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF | 25.98% | 16.38% |
TOPW Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF | 47.37% | 21.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TOPW and ARMW have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOPW and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 47.37%, compared with 25.98% for ARMW.
Find the right allocation for TOPW and ARMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer