PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOPW vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOPW vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOPW achieves a 7.71% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


TOPW

1D
-1.52%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.71%
6M
-0.67%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOPW vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TOPW
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF
7.71%-11.27%
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
363.23%-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TOPW and ARMW is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOPW vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF (TOPW) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOPW vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOPWARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

4.96

-4.71

Drawdowns

TOPW vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOPW drawdown since its inception was -29.87%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOPW and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOPWARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.87%

-48.47%

+18.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.02%

0.00%

-10.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.88%

-26.55%

+13.67%

Volatility

TOPW vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOPWARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.36%

88.46%

-61.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.36%

88.46%

-61.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.36%

88.46%

-61.10%

TOPW vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TOPW and ARMW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

TOPW vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

TOPW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 40.33%, more than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.20%16.38%
TOPW
Roundhill Top WeeklyPay ETF
40.33%21.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


TOPW and ARMW have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOPW and ARMW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

TOPW has the higher dividend yield at 40.33%, compared with 15.20% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOPW and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer