PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TOCT vs. EAPR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TOCT vs. EAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2027 (TOCT) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TOCT achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than EAPR's 7.71% return.


TOCT

1D
-0.42%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.96%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EAPR

1D
-2.83%
1M
-3.60%
YTD
7.71%
6M
8.37%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
9.15%
5Y*
4.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TOCT vs. EAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TOCT and EAPR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.56

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TOCT vs. EAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TOCT

EAPR
EAPR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
EAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TOCT vs. EAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to October 2027 (TOCT) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - April (EAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TOCT vs. EAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TOCTEAPRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.47

+0.63

Drawdowns

TOCT vs. EAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TOCT drawdown since its inception was -2.02%, smaller than the maximum EAPR drawdown of -17.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TOCT and EAPR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TOCTEAPRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-17.65%

+15.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-3.73%

+3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.39%

-4.06%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

Volatility

TOCT vs. EAPR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TOCTEAPRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

7.77%

-4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.01%

10.16%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.01%

10.09%

-7.08%

TOCT vs. EAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TOCT has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than EAPR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

TOCT vs. EAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TOCT nor EAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TOCT and EAPR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TOCT is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TOCT is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for EAPR.

TOCT and EAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TOCT and 0.89% for EAPR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TOCT and EAPR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer