TNVIX vs. SSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX).
TNVIX is managed by 1290 Funds. It was launched on Nov 12, 2014. SSLCX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 14, 2000.
Performance
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNVIX 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.18% | 13.91% | 11.48% | 21.31% | -11.37% | 21.85% | 11.33% | 19.81% | -14.34% | 19.00% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 0.38% | 4.99% | 9.85% | 13.09% | -13.53% | 41.16% | 14.65% | 21.72% | -14.28% | 11.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNVIX achieves a 4.18% return, which is significantly higher than SSLCX's 0.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TNVIX having a 10.40% annualized return and SSLCX not far behind at 9.91%.
TNVIX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- 4.18%
- 6M
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- 25.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.40%
SSLCX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- 0.38%
- 6M
- -2.12%
- 1Y
- 8.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TNVIX and SSLCX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
TNVIX vs. SSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
TNVIX
SSLCX
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) and DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNVIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.22 | 0.50 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.81 | 0.81 | +1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.11 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.62 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 2.03 | +4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNVIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 0.50 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.32 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.37 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNVIX and SSLCX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Dividend Comparison
TNVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than SSLCX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNVIX 1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund | 3.79% | 3.95% | 8.76% | 3.82% | 2.51% | 7.05% | 0.47% | 1.74% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.79% | 0.00% |
SSLCX DWS Small Cap Core Fund | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.52% | 0.68% | 1.07% | 1.67% | 0.35% | 0.16% | 5.99% | 5.78% | 0.60% | 8.42% |
Drawdowns
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNVIX drawdown since its inception was -42.75%, smaller than the maximum SSLCX drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNVIX and SSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNVIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.75% | -63.14% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.34% | -10.06% | -3.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.61% | -22.57% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.75% | -48.07% | +5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.49% | -5.55% | -3.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -11.38% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.09% | +0.42% |
Volatility
TNVIX vs. SSLCX - Volatility Comparison
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value Fund (TNVIX) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to DWS Small Cap Core Fund (SSLCX) at 4.67%. This indicates that TNVIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SSLCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNVIX | SSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 4.67% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.62% | 11.01% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 17.54% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 17.64% | +2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 21.06% | 0.00% |