PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TNOW.L is traded in USD, while ESIT.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNOW.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly lower than ESIT.L's 50.74% return.


TNOW.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
17.43%
YTD
26.74%
6M
26.38%
1Y
55.01%
3Y*
33.44%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
24.35%

ESIT.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
21.72%
YTD
50.74%
6M
49.93%
1Y
67.17%
3Y*
27.81%
5Y*
13.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TNOW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)
26.74%21.66%34.01%54.23%-31.79%29.94%9.71%
ESIT.L
iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
50.74%23.49%1.06%39.24%-32.51%26.10%11.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TNOW.L and ESIT.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020

0.78

The correlation between TNOW.L and ESIT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNOW.L
ESIT.L

Technology

40.0%
92.0%

Consumer Cyclical

20.7%

-

Healthcare

16.3%

-

Communication Services

10.3%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%

-

Utilities

3.4%

-

Financial Services

2.2%

-

Industrials

0.6%
2.7%

Energy

0.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

TNOW.L
40.0%
ESIT.L
92.0%

Consumer Cyclical

TNOW.L
20.7%
ESIT.L

-

Healthcare

TNOW.L
16.3%
ESIT.L

-

Communication Services

TNOW.L
10.3%
ESIT.L
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

TNOW.L
6.3%
ESIT.L

-

Utilities

TNOW.L
3.4%
ESIT.L

-

Financial Services

TNOW.L
2.2%
ESIT.L

-

Industrials

TNOW.L
0.6%
ESIT.L
2.7%

Energy

TNOW.L
0.2%
ESIT.L

-

Basic Materials

TNOW.L
0.1%
ESIT.L

-

Real Estate

TNOW.L

-

ESIT.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNOW.L
TNOW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIT.L
ESIT.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNOW.LESIT.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

4.48

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

12.34

-2.79

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the ESIT.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNOW.L and ESIT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNOW.LESIT.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.58

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.50

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.66

+0.39

Drawdowns

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNOW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, smaller than the maximum ESIT.L drawdown of -48.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNOW.L and ESIT.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNOW.LESIT.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-48.44%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-14.93%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.15%

-25.89%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-48.44%

+12.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.61%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-14.49%

+8.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

5.42%

+0.32%

Volatility

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) is 7.27%, while iShares MSCI Europe Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (ESIT.L) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that TNOW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNOW.LESIT.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

9.70%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

21.04%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

25.92%

-5.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

27.73%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

27.23%

-5.49%

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNOW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIT.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNOW.L vs. ESIT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TNOW.L nor ESIT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TNOW.L and ESIT.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIT.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIT.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TNOW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TNOW.L and 0.18% for ESIT.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNOW.L and ESIT.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer