PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNOW.L vs. 100D.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TNOW.L is traded in USD, while 100D.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 100D.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNOW.L achieves a 26.74% return, which is significantly higher than 100D.L's 5.65% return.


TNOW.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
17.43%
YTD
26.74%
6M
26.38%
1Y
55.01%
3Y*
33.44%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
24.35%

100D.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
5.65%
6M
9.06%
1Y
20.57%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TNOW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)
26.74%21.66%34.01%54.23%-31.79%29.94%43.80%17.29%
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
5.65%35.26%7.50%13.03%-6.40%16.93%-9.08%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TNOW.L and 100D.L is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.49

The correlation between TNOW.L and 100D.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNOW.L
100D.L

Technology

40.0%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

20.7%
4.7%

Healthcare

16.3%
13.6%

Communication Services

10.3%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
13.9%

Utilities

3.4%
5.3%

Financial Services

2.2%
24.5%

Industrials

0.6%
13.7%

Energy

0.2%
11.7%

Basic Materials

0.1%
8.5%

Real Estate

-

0.9%

Technology

TNOW.L
40.0%
100D.L
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TNOW.L
20.7%
100D.L
4.7%

Healthcare

TNOW.L
16.3%
100D.L
13.6%

Communication Services

TNOW.L
10.3%
100D.L
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

TNOW.L
6.3%
100D.L
13.9%

Utilities

TNOW.L
3.4%
100D.L
5.3%

Financial Services

TNOW.L
2.2%
100D.L
24.5%

Industrials

TNOW.L
0.6%
100D.L
13.7%

Energy

TNOW.L
0.2%
100D.L
11.7%

Basic Materials

TNOW.L
0.1%
100D.L
8.5%

Real Estate

TNOW.L

-

100D.L
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNOW.L
TNOW.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNOW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

100D.L
100D.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
100D.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
100D.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
100D.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
100D.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
100D.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) and Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNOW.L100D.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.28

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.09

+1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.55

7.13

+2.42

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNOW.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the 100D.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNOW.L and 100D.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNOW.L100D.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

1.53

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.64

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.46

+0.59

Drawdowns

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNOW.L drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, smaller than the maximum 100D.L drawdown of -42.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNOW.L and 100D.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNOW.L100D.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-42.39%

+6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.03%

-9.79%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.15%

-13.78%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.17%

-25.99%

-10.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-4.52%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-6.17%

+0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.74%

2.88%

+2.86%

Volatility

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD) (TNOW.L) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (100D.L) at 5.30%. This indicates that TNOW.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 100D.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNOW.L100D.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

5.30%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.66%

11.27%

+4.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.54%

13.38%

+7.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

16.63%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

19.32%

+2.42%

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNOW.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than 100D.L's 0.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNOW.L vs. 100D.L - Dividend Comparison

TNOW.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 100D.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
100D.L
Amundi FTSE 100 UCITS ETF
3.57%3.78%4.17%3.90%3.80%3.39%3.11%4.30%
TNOW.L
Lyxor MSCI World Information Technology TR UCITS ETF - Acc (USD)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNOW.L and 100D.L have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 100D.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

100D.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TNOW.L.

TNOW.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while 100D.L is Europe Equities. TNOW.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while 100D.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for TNOW.L and 0.14% for 100D.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNOW.L and 100D.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer