TNMAX vs. QSPRX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TNMAX (1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A) and QSPRX (AQR Style Premia Alternative R6) are both Multistrategy funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TNMAX returned 3.93%/yr vs 7.60%/yr for QSPRX. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. TNMAX charges 1.52%/yr vs 5.79%/yr for QSPRX.

Performance

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNMAX achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than QSPRX's 13.78% return. Over the past 10 years, TNMAX has underperformed QSPRX with an annualized return of 3.93%, while QSPRX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.60% annualized return.

TNMAX

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 10.25%
• 6M: 10.68%
• 1Y: 20.21%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 3.93%

QSPRX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 2.38%
• YTD: 13.78%
• 6M: 15.35%
• 1Y: 20.12%
• 3Y*: 21.83%
• 5Y*: 19.23%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TNMAX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A	10.25%	13.21%	8.95%	5.08%	-11.31%	3.00%	4.28%	7.38%	-4.34%	3.91%
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6	13.78%	14.94%	21.60%	12.50%	30.90%	25.14%	-21.91%	-8.10%	-12.32%	12.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TNMAX and QSPRX is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.21
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	-0.12

Return for Risk

TNMAX vs. QSPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNMAX

TNMAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
TNMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
TNMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
TNMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TNMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TNMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

QSPRX

QSPRX Risk / Return Rank: 54
QSPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QSPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QSPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
QSPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
QSPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TNMAX	QSPRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.78	1.98	+0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	2.95	+0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.34	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	3.75	+1.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.50	9.93	+11.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is higher than the QSPRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNMAX and QSPRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TNMAX	QSPRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.78	1.98	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	1.21	-0.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.59	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.59	+0.01

Drawdowns

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNMAX drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum QSPRX drawdown of -41.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNMAX and QSPRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TNMAX	QSPRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.29%	-41.22%	+23.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.64%	-5.06%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.27%	-9.25%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.46%	-17.17%	+0.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.29%	-41.22%	+23.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	0.00%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-10.08%	+6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	1.91%	-0.96%

Volatility

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) is 1.59%, while AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that TNMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QSPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TNMAX	QSPRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.59%	3.08%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.18%	7.18%	-1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.38%	9.58%	-2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.66%	15.91%	-8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.12%	12.86%	-5.74%

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNMAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPRX's 5.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Dividend Comparison

TNMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than QSPRX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6	2.31%	2.63%	6.99%	23.75%	22.67%	12.85%	0.00%	1.62%	1.09%	7.15%	1.74%	5.87%
TNMAX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A	1.76%	1.94%	1.33%	3.12%	2.59%	10.42%	0.55%	1.92%	0.97%	0.37%	0.37%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TNMAX and QSPRX in my portfolio?

TNMAX and QSPRX have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TNMAX or QSPRX?

QSPRX has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to TNMAX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNMAX dropped -17.29% vs QSPRX's -41.22%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TNMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.