TNMAX vs. QSPRX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX).
TNMAX is an actively managed fund by Equitable. It was launched on Jul 6, 2015. QSPRX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Sep 2, 2014.
Performance
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNMAX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A | 5.27% | 13.21% | 8.95% | 5.08% | -11.31% | 3.00% | 4.28% | 7.38% | -4.34% | 3.91% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 9.87% | 14.94% | 21.60% | 12.50% | 30.90% | 25.14% | -21.91% | -8.10% | -12.32% | 12.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNMAX achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than QSPRX's 9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TNMAX has underperformed QSPRX with an annualized return of 3.66%, while QSPRX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.14% annualized return.
TNMAX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 17.06%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 3.93%
- 10Y*
- 3.66%
QSPRX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 6M
- 13.19%
- 1Y
- 13.06%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 18.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNMAX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is lower than QSPRX's 5.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNMAX vs. QSPRX — Risk / Return Rank
TNMAX
QSPRX
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNMAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.39 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 1.89 | +0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 1.74 | +1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.26 | 5.27 | +9.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNMAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.39 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 1.19 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.56 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNMAX and QSPRX is -0.12. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Dividend Comparison
TNMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than QSPRX's 2.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNMAX 1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A | 1.84% | 1.94% | 1.33% | 3.12% | 2.59% | 10.42% | 0.55% | 1.92% | 0.97% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 2.39% | 2.63% | 6.99% | 23.75% | 22.67% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 7.15% | 1.74% | 5.87% |
Drawdowns
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNMAX drawdown since its inception was -17.29%, smaller than the maximum QSPRX drawdown of -41.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNMAX and QSPRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNMAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.29% | -41.22% | +23.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.73% | -7.75% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.46% | -17.17% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.29% | -41.22% | +23.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.48% | -0.21% | -2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -10.21% | +6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 2.70% | -1.55% |
Volatility
TNMAX vs. QSPRX - Volatility Comparison
1290 Multi-Alternative Strategies Fund Class A (TNMAX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) at 2.49%. This indicates that TNMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QSPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNMAX | QSPRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.49% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.74% | 6.51% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.81% | 10.11% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.68% | 16.00% | -8.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.12% | 12.80% | -5.68% |