PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNHIX vs. CCLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 1290 High Yield Bond Fund (TNHIX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TNHIX
1290 High Yield Bond Fund
-1.42%8.03%8.13%11.51%-9.91%4.08%7.06%4.93%
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
0.96%8.93%12.62%12.66%2.32%10.38%8.73%2.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNHIX achieves a -1.42% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 0.96% return.


TNHIX

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.52%
YTD
-1.42%
6M
-0.12%
1Y
5.91%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
4.90%

CCLFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.96%
6M
3.09%
1Y
7.64%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNHIX has a 1.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TNHIX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNHIX
TNHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TNHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
TNHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

CCLFX
CCLFX Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CCLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CCLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1290 High Yield Bond Fund (TNHIX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TNHIXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

8.00

-6.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

16.02

-13.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

5.88

-4.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

16.71

-14.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.02

101.68

-92.65

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNHIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the CCLFX Sharpe Ratio of 8.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNHIX and CCLFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TNHIXCCLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

8.00

-6.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

5.17

-4.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

4.54

-3.88

Correlation

The correlation between TNHIX and CCLFX is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison

TNHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, less than CCLFX's 10.37% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TNHIX
1290 High Yield Bond Fund
5.87%6.29%6.37%5.43%5.44%4.76%5.16%5.51%5.84%3.62%0.01%
CCLFX
Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund
10.37%10.47%11.27%10.96%3.96%7.03%6.90%0.61%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNHIX drawdown since its inception was -18.62%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNHIX and CCLFX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TNHIXCCLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.62%

-3.91%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.96%

-0.46%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.52%

-2.25%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.09%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.38%

-0.16%

-3.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

0.08%

+0.53%

Volatility

TNHIX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison

1290 High Yield Bond Fund (TNHIX) has a higher volatility of 1.34% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.32%. This indicates that TNHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TNHIXCCLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

0.32%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

0.65%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37%

0.97%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.18%

1.74%

+2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

1.89%

+2.69%