PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNGY vs. JMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNGY vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNGY achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than JMUB's 1.47% return.


TNGY

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
10.84%
6M
11.42%
1Y
12.82%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JMUB

1D
-0.01%
1M
1.27%
YTD
1.47%
6M
1.63%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
1.27%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNGY vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
10.84%-2.37%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
1.47%4.39%

Correlation

The correlation between TNGY and JMUB is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNGY vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNGY
TNGY Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TNGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNGY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TNGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNGY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNGY vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNGYJMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.52

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.22

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.85

7.63

-3.78

TNGY vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNGY and JMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNGY vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNGY drawdown since its inception was -9.79%, smaller than the maximum JMUB drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNGY and JMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNGYJMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-12.50%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-2.55%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-0.39%

-7.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-2.50%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

0.74%

+2.60%

Volatility

TNGY vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Energy Fund (TNGY) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) at 0.69%. This indicates that TNGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNGYJMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

0.69%

+5.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

1.87%

+10.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.01%

2.39%

+13.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

3.33%

+13.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.44%

4.13%

+12.31%

TNGY vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNGY has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNGY vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

TNGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than JMUB's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.59%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%
TNGY
Tortoise Energy Fund
3.55%2.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TNGY and JMUB have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNGY has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to JMUB (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNGY dropped -9.79% vs JMUB's -12.50%.

On 1-year performance, TNGY leads with 12.82% vs 5.65% for JMUB. On fees, JMUB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JMUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TNGY has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMUB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TNGY.

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 3.55% for TNGY.

TNGY is categorized as Energy Equities, while JMUB is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise Capital and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TNGY and 0.18% for JMUB.

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNGY and JMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer