PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMUUX vs. DINDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Municipal Bond Fund (TMUUX) and Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMUUX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.44%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.76%
1Y
5.44%
3Y*
2.92%
5Y*
0.45%
10Y*
1.50%

DINDX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMUUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Municipal Bond Fund
1.62%2.42%1.73%6.04%-9.03%1.21%3.57%7.44%0.54%4.84%
DINDX
Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
0.00%8.28%6.76%8.49%-7.06%0.01%5.10%9.59%-1.28%7.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TMUUX and DINDX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 1997

0.29

The correlation between TMUUX and DINDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.45 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMUUX vs. DINDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMUUX
TMUUX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TMUUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUUX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DINDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Municipal Bond Fund (TMUUX) and Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund (DINDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMUUXDINDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.85

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMUUXDINDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.79%

Volatility

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMUUXDINDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.96%

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMUUX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DINDX's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMUUX vs. DINDX - Dividend Comparison

TMUUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while DINDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DINDX
Morgan Stanley Global Fixed Income Opportunities Fund
2.27%4.69%5.36%4.69%5.82%3.52%2.98%3.43%3.68%3.13%6.24%4.80%
TMUUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Municipal Bond Fund
2.31%2.13%3.37%3.11%2.41%1.95%2.54%3.30%2.92%2.77%5.74%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMUUX and DINDX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMUUX and DINDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer