PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMUS vs. MSTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMUS vs. MSTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly higher than MSTR's -18.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has underperformed MSTR with an annualized return of 16.66%, while MSTR has yielded a comparatively higher 20.92% annualized return.


TMUS

1D
1.77%
1M
2.65%
YTD
-5.91%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
-15.50%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
16.66%

MSTR

1D
3.18%
1M
-30.13%
YTD
-18.41%
6M
-29.74%
1Y
-67.62%
3Y*
63.46%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
20.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMUS vs. MSTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-5.91%-6.58%39.70%15.02%20.71%-13.99%71.96%23.28%0.16%10.43%
MSTR
Strategy Inc
-18.41%-47.53%358.54%346.15%-74.00%40.13%172.42%11.65%-2.70%-33.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TMUS and MSTR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2007

0.24

The correlation between TMUS and MSTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMUS:

$208.40B

MSTR:

$41.40B

EPS

TMUS:

$9.41

MSTR:

-$40.19

PS Ratio

TMUS:

2.34

MSTR:

77.72

PB Ratio

TMUS:

3.73

MSTR:

1.13

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMUS:

$90.53B

MSTR:

$490.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMUS:

$34.92B

MSTR:

$334.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

TMUS:

$28.22B

MSTR:

$466.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMUS vs. MSTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTR
MSTR Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
MSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMUS vs. MSTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and Strategy Inc (MSTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMUSMSTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.82

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.88

+0.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-1.27

+0.39

TMUS vs. MSTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is higher than the MSTR Sharpe Ratio of -0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMUS and MSTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMUS vs. MSTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, smaller than the maximum MSTR drawdown of -99.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and MSTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMUSMSTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-99.86%

+13.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-76.53%

+46.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.65%

-77.42%

+43.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.65%

-84.11%

+50.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-89.27%

+55.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.12%

-73.84%

+44.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-86.45%

+60.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.87%

53.01%

-35.14%

Volatility

TMUS vs. MSTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 7.72%, while Strategy Inc (MSTR) has a volatility of 21.60%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMUSMSTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

21.60%

-13.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

57.34%

-38.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.99%

71.15%

-46.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

90.79%

-66.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

73.80%

-47.72%

Dividends

TMUS vs. MSTR - Dividend Comparison

TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while MSTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
MSTR
Strategy Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.08%1.80%1.28%0.41%

Financials

TMUS vs. MSTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and Strategy Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
23.11B
124.30M
(TMUS) Total Revenue
(MSTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TMUS and MSTR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSTR has higher volatility (21.60%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs MSTR's -99.86%.

TMUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMUS and MSTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer