PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMUS vs. KKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TMUS vs. KKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -5.91% return, which is significantly higher than KKR's -24.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TMUS has underperformed KKR with an annualized return of 16.66%, while KKR has yielded a comparatively higher 24.52% annualized return.


TMUS

1D
1.77%
1M
2.65%
YTD
-5.91%
6M
-2.11%
1Y
-15.50%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
16.66%

KKR

1D
0.99%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
-24.22%
6M
-29.28%
1Y
-20.15%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
12.18%
10Y*
24.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMUS vs. KKR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
-5.91%-6.58%39.70%15.02%20.71%-13.99%71.96%23.28%0.16%10.43%
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.
-24.22%-13.32%79.65%80.48%-36.98%85.76%41.13%51.57%-4.28%41.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TMUS and KKR is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2010

0.29

The correlation between TMUS and KKR shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TMUS:

$208.40B

KKR:

$91.83B

EPS

TMUS:

$9.41

KKR:

$3.10

PE Ratio

TMUS:

20.09

KKR:

31.02

PEG Ratio

TMUS:

0.31

KKR:

3.27

PS Ratio

TMUS:

2.34

KKR:

4.60

PB Ratio

TMUS:

3.73

KKR:

1.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

TMUS:

$90.53B

KKR:

$19.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TMUS:

$34.92B

KKR:

$8.35B

EBITDA (TTM)

TMUS:

$28.22B

KKR:

$9.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMUS vs. KKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMUS
TMUS Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TMUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMUS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TMUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMUS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

KKR
KKR Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
KKR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
KKR Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMUS vs. KKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TMUSKKRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

0.92

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

-0.51

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

-0.92

+0.04

TMUS vs. KKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the KKR Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMUS and KKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TMUS vs. KKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than KKR's maximum drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and KKR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMUSKKRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.29%

-53.10%

-33.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.37%

-44.62%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.65%

-49.42%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.65%

-49.42%

+15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.65%

-49.42%

+15.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.12%

-41.85%

+12.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-16.22%

-9.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.87%

24.65%

-6.78%

Volatility

TMUS vs. KKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) is 7.72%, while KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that TMUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMUSKKRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.72%

9.89%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

29.26%

-10.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.99%

37.32%

-12.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.90%

39.23%

-15.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.08%

36.62%

-10.54%

Dividends

TMUS vs. KKR - Dividend Comparison

TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than KKR's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KKR
KKR & Co. Inc.
0.78%0.57%0.47%0.78%1.31%0.77%1.31%1.71%3.23%3.18%4.16%10.13%
TMUS
T-Mobile US, Inc.
2.08%1.80%1.28%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

TMUS vs. KKR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between T-Mobile US, Inc. and KKR & Co. Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
23.11B
4.00B
(TMUS) Total Revenue
(KKR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TMUS vs. KKR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between T-Mobile US, Inc. and KKR & Co. Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
99.5%
Portfolio components
TMUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KKR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.98B and revenue of 4.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.5%.

TMUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

KKR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported an operating income of 205.35M and revenue of 4.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

TMUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, T-Mobile US, Inc. reported a net income of 2.50B and revenue of 23.11B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

KKR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KKR & Co. Inc. reported a net income of 405.23M and revenue of 4.00B, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TMUS and KKR have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KKR has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to TMUS (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMUS dropped -86.29% vs KKR's -53.10%.

KKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.61 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMUS and KKR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer