TMUS vs. EUNA.DE
TMUS (T-Mobile US, Inc.) is a stock, while EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) is Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Over the past 5 years, TMUS returned 6.39%/yr vs -1.96%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TMUS is traded in USD, while EUNA.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUNA.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMUS achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly lower than EUNA.DE's -1.52% return.
TMUS
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- -6.03%
- 6M
- -2.73%
- 1Y
- -15.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.68%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- 16.81%
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- -1.52%
- 6M
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.80%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- -1.96%
- 10Y*
- —
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | -6.03% | -6.58% | 39.70% | 15.02% | 20.71% | -13.99% | 71.96% | 23.28% | 0.16% | 5.32% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -1.52% | 16.18% | -4.33% | 7.70% | -18.29% | -10.11% | 14.01% | 2.85% | -5.85% | 2.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMUS and EUNA.DE is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017 | 0.09 |
The correlation between TMUS and EUNA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
TMUS
EUNA.DE
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMUS | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.31 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.87 | 0.73 | -1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMUS drawdown since its inception was -86.29%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMUS and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMUS | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.29% | -34.87% | -51.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.37% | -5.76% | -24.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.65% | -10.62% | -23.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.65% | -32.03% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.21% | -13.41% | -15.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.96% | -13.60% | -12.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 2.48% | +15.46% |
Volatility
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 2.23%. This indicates that TMUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMUS | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 2.23% | +5.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.08% | 5.89% | +13.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 8.12% | +16.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.91% | 9.79% | +14.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.08% | 9.06% | +17.02% |
Dividends
TMUS vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
TMUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMUS T-Mobile US, Inc. | 2.09% | 1.80% | 1.28% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMUS and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TMUS and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer