TMSF vs. SPSK
TMSF (T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF) and SPSK (SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMSF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SPSK is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Dow Jones Sukuk Total Return (No Coupon Reinvestment). TMSF is actively managed, while SPSK is passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMSF charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPSK.
Performance
TMSF vs. SPSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSF achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than SPSK's 0.14% return.
TMSF
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPSK
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.45%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 0.89%
- 10Y*
- —
TMSF vs. SPSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 1.77% | 1.29% |
SPSK SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF | 0.14% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSF and SPSK is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSF vs. SPSK — Risk / Return Rank
TMSF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPSK
TMSF vs. SPSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF (SPSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMSF | SPSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.22 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMSF vs. SPSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, smaller than the maximum SPSK drawdown of -12.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and SPSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSF | SPSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -12.83% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -3.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.92% | +0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.37% | -3.80% | +3.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility
TMSF vs. SPSK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSF | SPSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93% | 3.84% | -0.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.93% | 5.28% | -2.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.93% | 5.45% | -2.52% |
TMSF vs. SPSK - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than SPSK's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSF vs. SPSK - Dividend Comparison
TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than SPSK's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPSK SP Funds Dow Jones Global Sukuk ETF | 4.23% | 3.63% | 3.53% | 2.95% | 2.22% | 2.56% | 1.78% |
TMSF T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF | 3.06% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMSF and SPSK have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SPSK.
SPSK has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.
TMSF is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while SPSK is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.50% for SPSK.
Find the right allocation for TMSF and SPSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer