PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMSF vs. PSDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMSF vs. PSDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMSF achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly higher than PSDM's 1.23% return.


TMSF

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.53%
YTD
1.71%
6M
2.23%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSDM

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.23%
6M
1.61%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMSF vs. PSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMSF and PSDM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMSF vs. PSDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMSF

PSDM
PSDM Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
PSDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSDM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PSDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMSF vs. PSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF (TMSF) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMSF vs. PSDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSFPSDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.99

2.97

-0.97

Drawdowns

TMSF vs. PSDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMSF drawdown since its inception was -2.28%, which is greater than PSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSF and PSDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSFPSDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-1.19%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.25%

-0.16%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.38%

-0.17%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.26%

Volatility

TMSF vs. PSDM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSFPSDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

1.75%

+1.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.01%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.94%

2.01%

+0.93%

TMSF vs. PSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMSF has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than PSDM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMSF vs. PSDM - Dividend Comparison

TMSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.06%, less than PSDM's 4.85% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
PSDM
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF
4.85%4.57%5.17%2.91%
TMSF
T. Rowe Price Multi-Sector Income ETF
3.06%0.75%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMSF and PSDM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMSF is cheaper at 0.37% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMSF is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for PSDM.

PSDM has the higher dividend yield at 4.85%, compared with 3.06% for TMSF.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for TMSF and 0.40% for PSDM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMSF and PSDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer