TMPFX vs. FGUSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMPFX (Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund) and FGUSX (Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, TMPFX returned 3.99%/yr vs 4.67%/yr for FGUSX. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. TMPFX charges 1.14%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FGUSX.

Performance

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) and Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TMPFX having a 1.52% return and FGUSX slightly lower at 1.49%.

TMPFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.52%
• 6M: 1.78%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 3.99%
• 5Y*: 2.67%
• 10Y*: —

FGUSX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 2.07%
• 1Y: 4.80%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund	1.52%	3.71%	4.26%	3.90%	0.00%
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund	1.49%	5.22%	4.67%	4.61%	0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between TMPFX and FGUSX is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2022	-0.04

Return for Risk

TMPFX vs. FGUSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGUSX

FGUSX Risk / Return Rank: 98
FGUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FGUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
FGUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) and Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMPFX	FGUSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	6.81	3.36	+3.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	10.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	3.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	15.83	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	63.75	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMPFX Sharpe Ratio is 6.81, which is higher than the FGUSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMPFX and FGUSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMPFX	FGUSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.81	3.36	+3.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	3.06	-2.25

Drawdowns

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMPFX drawdown since its inception was -3.52%, which is greater than FGUSX's maximum drawdown of -0.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMPFX and FGUSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMPFX	FGUSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.52%	-0.31%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-0.30%	+0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.52%	-0.31%	-3.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-3.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.10%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.65%	-0.06%	-0.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	0.08%	-0.08%

Volatility

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund (TMPFX) is 0.16%, while Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund (FGUSX) has a volatility of 0.46%. This indicates that TMPFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMPFX	FGUSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.16%	0.46%	-0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.39%	1.02%	-0.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56%	1.43%	-0.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.33%	1.57%	+0.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.81%	1.57%	+0.24%

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMPFX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FGUSX's 0.26% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMPFX vs. FGUSX - Dividend Comparison

TMPFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than FGUSX's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
FGUSX Federated Hermes Government Ultrashort Fund	4.37%	4.66%	4.56%	4.70%	0.33%
TMPFX Tactical Multi-Purpose Fund	3.75%	3.81%	4.15%	3.90%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMPFX and FGUSX in my portfolio?

TMPFX and FGUSX have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMPFX or FGUSX?

FGUSX has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to TMPFX (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMPFX dropped -3.52% vs FGUSX's -0.31%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMPFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.81 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.