TMNL vs. TSPA
TMNL (T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF) and TSPA (T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMNL is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while TSPA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMNL charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for TSPA.
Performance
TMNL vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMNL achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than TSPA's 11.06% return.
TMNL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSPA
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 1Y
- 21.70%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.85%
- 10Y*
- —
TMNL vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMNL T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF | 2.31% | 0.32% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 11.06% | 3.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMNL and TSPA is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMNL vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank
TMNL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSPA
TMNL vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF (TMNL) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMNL | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMNL vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMNL drawdown since its inception was -2.94%, smaller than the maximum TSPA drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMNL and TSPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMNL | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -24.72% | +21.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.04% | -0.90% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.53% | -5.40% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
TMNL vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMNL | TSPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.33% | 13.18% | -8.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 17.12% | -12.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 16.99% | -12.66% |
TMNL vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMNL has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMNL vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison
TMNL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, more than TSPA's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMNL T. Rowe Price Long Municipal Income ETF | 2.48% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSPA T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.50% | 0.41% | 1.16% | 0.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMNL and TSPA have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMNL is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMNL is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for TSPA.
TMNL has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.56% for TSPA.
TMNL is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for TMNL and 0.34% for TSPA.
Find the right allocation for TMNL and TSPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer