TMB vs. XAGG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAGG.

Performance

TMB vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMB

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAGG

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMB vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.34%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	0.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TMB and XAGG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	0.64

Return for Risk

TMB vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMB	XAGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.77	1.94	+3.83

Drawdowns

TMB vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum XAGG drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and XAGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMB	XAGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-2.88%	+2.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-0.37%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-0.57%	+0.51%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMB	XAGG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46%	3.47%	-1.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.46%	3.47%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.46%	3.47%	-1.01%

TMB vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMB vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison

TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than XAGG's 3.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.36%	0.00%
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF	3.86%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMB and XAGG in my portfolio?

TMB and XAGG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMB or XAGG?

On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMB or XAGG?

XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMB or XAGG?

XAGG has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

What is the main difference between TMB and XAGG?

They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.50% for XAGG.