PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMB vs. PSQO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMB vs. PSQO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMB

1D
0.17%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PSQO

1D
0.05%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.68%
6M
2.31%
1Y
5.75%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMB vs. PSQO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMB and PSQO is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMB vs. PSQO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMB

PSQO
PSQO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PSQO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSQO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSQO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PSQO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSQO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMB vs. PSQO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMB vs. PSQO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMBPSQODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.77

3.14

+2.63

Drawdowns

TMB vs. PSQO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum PSQO drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and PSQO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMBPSQODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-0.76%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-0.12%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.11%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.16%

Volatility

TMB vs. PSQO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMBPSQODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

1.55%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.46%

2.00%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.46%

2.00%

+0.46%

TMB vs. PSQO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than PSQO's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMB vs. PSQO - Dividend Comparison

TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than PSQO's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PSQO
Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF
4.13%4.45%1.40%
TMB
Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF
0.36%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMB and PSQO have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSQO is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSQO is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for TMB.

PSQO has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Palmer Square. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.52% for PSQO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMB and PSQO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer