TMB vs. FTGC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TMB is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Thornburg, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.

Performance

TMB vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TMB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FTGC

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: 26.15%
• 6M: 24.84%
• 1Y: 40.32%
• 3Y*: 17.80%
• 5Y*: 12.90%
• 10Y*: 7.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMB vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.17%
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	-0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TMB and FTGC is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	-0.21

Return for Risk

TMB vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTGC

FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 81
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMB vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMB	FTGC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.59	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.18	0.23	+2.95

Drawdowns

TMB vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and FTGC.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMB	FTGC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.24%	-59.47%	+59.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.91%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.64%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-5.40%	+5.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-27.42%	+27.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.41%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMB	FTGC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.55%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.17%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.52%	15.62%	-13.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.52%	15.98%	-13.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.52%	14.71%	-12.19%

TMB vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMB vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FTGC's 15.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund	15.20%	17.74%	3.05%	3.34%	10.35%	7.21%	0.00%	0.81%	0.80%	1.21%
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMB and FTGC in my portfolio?

TMB and FTGC have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMB or FTGC?

On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMB or FTGC?

TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMB or FTGC?

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

What is the main difference between TMB and FTGC?

TMB is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.95% for FTGC.