PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMB vs. FFUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMB vs. FFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMB

1D
0.17%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FFUT

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.15%
YTD
12.38%
6M
13.61%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMB vs. FFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMB and FFUT is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMB vs. FFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMB vs. FFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMBFFUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.77

1.96

+3.80

Drawdowns

TMB vs. FFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum FFUT drawdown of -2.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and FFUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMBFFUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.24%

-2.84%

+2.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-1.21%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.06%

-0.88%

+0.82%

Volatility

TMB vs. FFUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMBFFUTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46%

11.15%

-8.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.46%

11.15%

-8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.46%

11.15%

-8.69%

TMB vs. FFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FFUT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMB vs. FFUT - Dividend Comparison

TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than FFUT's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM2025
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.86%2.09%
TMB
Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF
0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TMB and FFUT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.

TMB is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while FFUT is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 0.80% for FFUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMB and FFUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer