TMB vs. ADPV
TMB (Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF) and ADPV (Adaptiv Select ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMB is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Thornburg, while ADPV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Adaptiv. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. TMB charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ADPV.
Performance
TMB vs. ADPV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADPV
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 40.31%
- 3Y*
- 27.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMB vs. ADPV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.34% |
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | 1.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMB and ADPV is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMB vs. ADPV — Risk / Return Rank
TMB
ADPV
TMB vs. ADPV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF (TMB) and Adaptiv Select ETF (ADPV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMB | ADPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.77 | 0.98 | +4.79 |
Drawdowns
TMB vs. ADPV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMB drawdown since its inception was -0.24%, smaller than the maximum ADPV drawdown of -22.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMB and ADPV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMB | ADPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.24% | -22.30% | +22.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -5.46% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.68% | — |
Volatility
TMB vs. ADPV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMB | ADPV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.46% | 24.10% | -21.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 20.83% | -18.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.46% | 20.83% | -18.37% |
TMB vs. ADPV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMB has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ADPV's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMB vs. ADPV - Dividend Comparison
TMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than ADPV's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADPV Adaptiv Select ETF | 0.63% | 0.70% | 0.67% | 0.22% | 0.25% |
TMB Thornburg Multi Sector Bond ETF | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMB and ADPV have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ADPV.
ADPV has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.36% for TMB.
TMB is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while ADPV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Adaptiv. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TMB and 1.00% for ADPV.
Find the right allocation for TMB and ADPV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer