TMAR vs. TFJL

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) and TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both Defined Outcome funds. TMAR is passively managed, while TFJL is actively managed. Over the past year, TMAR returned 21.88% vs -5.68% for TFJL. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TMAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for TFJL.

Performance

TMAR vs. TFJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) and Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAR achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than TFJL's -4.54% return.

TMAR

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: 11.91%
• YTD: 13.13%
• 1Y: 21.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.04%

TFJL

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -2.15%
• 6M: -4.05%
• YTD: -4.54%
• 1Y: -5.68%
• 3Y*: -1.20%
• 5Y*: -4.34%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	$39.99K	$35.98K	$49.78K
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	$75.59K	$91.81K	$229.25K

TMAR vs. TFJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	13.13%	15.97%
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-4.54%	-4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAR and TFJL is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.16

Return for Risk

TMAR vs. TFJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMAR

TMAR Risk / Return Rank: 79
TMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TFJL

TFJL Risk / Return Rank: 3
TFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
TFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMAR vs. TFJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) and Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMAR	TFJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	-0.69	+2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	-0.93	+3.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.90	+0.52
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	-0.61	+4.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.04	-1.20	+15.23

TMAR vs. TFJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the TFJL Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMAR and TFJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TMAR vs. TFJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.93%, smaller than the maximum TFJL drawdown of -25.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAR and TFJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMAR	TFJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.93%	-25.45%	+15.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-9.32%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.49%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	-24.56%	+22.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.96%	-15.23%	+14.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	4.76%	-3.20%

Volatility

TMAR vs. TFJL - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) at 1.63%. This indicates that TMAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TFJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMAR	TFJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	1.63%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.44%	5.98%	+5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	8.23%	+3.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.74%	9.42%	+3.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.74%	9.00%	+3.74%

TMAR vs. TFJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TFJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMAR vs. TFJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither TMAR nor TFJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMAR and TFJL in my portfolio?

TMAR and TFJL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMAR or TFJL?

TMAR has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to TFJL (1.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMAR dropped -9.93% vs TFJL's -25.45%.

Which ETF is better, TMAR or TFJL?

On 1-year performance, TMAR leads with 21.88% vs -5.68% for TFJL. On fees, TFJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, TFJL has been the lower-risk option at 1.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMAR or TFJL?

Over the 1-year period, TMAR has performed better with a 21.88% return vs -5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMAR or TFJL?

TFJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMAR or TFJL?

TMAR and TFJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TMAR and TFJL?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TMAR and 0.79% for TFJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.