TMAR vs. TEND

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) and TEND (iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. TMAR is passively managed, while TEND is actively managed. Their 0.71 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMAR charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TEND.

Performance

TMAR vs. TEND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF (TEND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMAR achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly higher than TEND's 9.43% return.

TMAR

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: 1.56%
• 6M: 11.91%
• YTD: 13.13%
• 1Y: 21.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 22.04%

TEND

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 2.35%
• 6M: 8.68%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF	$222.17K	$176.43K	$335.82K
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	$75.59K	$91.81K	$229.25K

TMAR vs. TEND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	13.13%	2.45%
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF	9.43%	1.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TMAR and TEND is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

TMAR vs. TEND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TMAR

TMAR Risk / Return Rank: 79
TMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
TMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
TMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 87

TEND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TMAR vs. TEND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) and iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF (TEND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMAR	TEND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.04	—	—

Drawdowns

TMAR vs. TEND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMAR drawdown since its inception was -9.93%, which is greater than TEND's maximum drawdown of -5.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMAR and TEND.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMAR	TEND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.93%	-5.92%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.17%	0.00%	-2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.96%	-0.74%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMAR	TEND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.44%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.09%	8.24%	+3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.74%	8.24%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.74%	8.24%	+4.50%

TMAR vs. TEND - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMAR has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TEND's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMAR vs. TEND - Dividend Comparison

TMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025
TEND iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Dec ETF	0.13%	0.14%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMAR and TEND in my portfolio?

TMAR and TEND have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMAR or TEND?

On fees, TEND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMAR or TEND?

TEND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMAR or TEND?

TEND has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for TMAR.

What is the main difference between TMAR and TEND?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TMAR and 0.50% for TEND.