PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TM vs. SIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TM vs. SIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TM is traded in USD, while SIS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the SIS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TM achieves a -17.88% return, which is significantly lower than SIS.TO's 29.65% return. Over the past 10 years, TM has underperformed SIS.TO with an annualized return of 8.31%, while SIS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.42% annualized return.


TM

1D
-1.50%
1M
-6.27%
YTD
-17.88%
6M
-10.47%
1Y
-3.02%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
2.03%
10Y*
8.31%

SIS.TO

1D
2.12%
1M
3.29%
YTD
29.65%
6M
38.28%
1Y
56.22%
3Y*
23.08%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
16.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TM vs. SIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
-17.88%13.82%8.88%38.23%-24.43%23.21%13.62%22.69%-5.81%12.10%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
29.65%23.41%24.33%14.89%-28.95%35.99%9.98%15.16%-32.30%83.89%

Correlation

The correlation between TM and SIS.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2006

0.16

The correlation between TM and SIS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TM:

$229.10B

SIS.TO:

CA$2.17B

EPS

TM:

$2.98K

SIS.TO:

CA$1.10

PE Ratio

TM:

0.06

SIS.TO:

27.19

PEG Ratio

TM:

0.00

SIS.TO:

0.43

PS Ratio

TM:

0.00

SIS.TO:

2.31

PB Ratio

TM:

0.01

SIS.TO:

3.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

TM:

$51.16T

SIS.TO:

CA$928.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TM:

$8.54T

SIS.TO:

CA$362.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

TM:

$7.11T

SIS.TO:

CA$176.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TM vs. SIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TM
TM Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SIS.TO
SIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TM vs. SIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMSIS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.42

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

5.70

-5.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.27

16.72

-17.00

TM vs. SIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TM Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TM and SIS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMSIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

2.38

-2.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.31

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.50

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.36

-0.05

Drawdowns

TM vs. SIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TM drawdown since its inception was -60.15%, smaller than the maximum SIS.TO drawdown of -77.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TM and SIS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMSIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.15%

-77.91%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.20%

-9.91%

-19.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.92%

-36.04%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.80%

-46.92%

+10.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-66.20%

+29.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.20%

-3.28%

-25.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.99%

-20.91%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.07%

3.37%

+7.70%

Volatility

TM vs. SIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) have volatilities of 7.08% and 6.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMSIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.08%

6.79%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.33%

19.06%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.13%

23.77%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.91%

27.79%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.63%

33.06%

-9.43%

Dividends

TM vs. SIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

TM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than SIS.TO's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
1.86%2.40%2.65%3.42%3.62%2.54%3.23%3.11%2.91%1.73%1.98%3.09%
TM
Toyota Motor Corporation
1.63%2.95%2.81%2.45%2.90%2.45%2.74%1.30%3.40%2.96%3.23%5.59%

Financials

TM vs. SIS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Toyota Motor Corporation and Savaria Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00T4.00T6.00T8.00T10.00T12.00T14.00T20222023202420252026
12.83T
235.55M
(TM) Total Revenue
(SIS.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TM values in USD, SIS.TO values in CAD

TM vs. SIS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Toyota Motor Corporation and Savaria Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
15.1%
39.0%
Portfolio components
TM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

SIS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.74M and revenue of 235.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

TM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

SIS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported an operating income of 33.15M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

TM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

SIS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a net income of 22.68M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TM and SIS.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TM and SIS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer