TM vs. DOLE

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

TM (Toyota Motor Corporation) and DOLE (Dole plc) are both stocks. TM operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while DOLE operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, TM returned 8.28%/yr vs 2.07%/yr for DOLE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TM vs. DOLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) and Dole plc (DOLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TM achieves a -17.88% return, which is significantly lower than DOLE's -8.14% return.

TM

• 1D: -1.50%
• 1M: -6.27%
• YTD: -17.88%
• 6M: -10.47%
• 1Y: -3.02%
• 3Y*: 8.28%
• 5Y*: 2.03%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

DOLE

• 1D: -2.28%
• 1M: -8.00%
• YTD: -8.14%
• 6M: -6.61%
• 1Y: 1.46%
• 3Y*: 2.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TM vs. DOLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TM Toyota Motor Corporation	-17.88%	13.82%	8.88%	38.23%	-24.43%	3.31%
DOLE Dole plc	-8.14%	13.36%	12.83%	30.80%	-25.25%	-10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TM and DOLE is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2021	0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap TM : $229.10B DOLE : $1.31B
EPS TM : $2.98K DOLE : $0.96
PE Ratio TM : 0.06 DOLE : 14.20
PEG Ratio TM : 0.00 DOLE : 0.97
PS Ratio TM : 0.00 DOLE : 0.14
PB Ratio TM : 0.01 DOLE : 0.95
Total Revenue (TTM) TM : $51.16T DOLE : $9.42B
Gross Profit (TTM) TM : $8.54T DOLE : $717.11M
EBITDA (TTM) TM : $7.11T DOLE : $332.26M

Return for Risk

TM vs. DOLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TM

TM Risk / Return Rank: 37
TM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
TM Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
TM Omega Ratio Rank: 33
TM Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
TM Martin Ratio Rank: 38

DOLE

DOLE Risk / Return Rank: 42
DOLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
DOLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
DOLE Omega Ratio Rank: 37
DOLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
DOLE Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TM vs. DOLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) and Dole plc (DOLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TM	DOLE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.10	0.06	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	0.25	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.03	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	0.09	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.27	0.19	-0.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TM vs. DOLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TM Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the DOLE Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TM and DOLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TM	DOLE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.10	0.06	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.04	+0.27

Drawdowns

TM vs. DOLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TM drawdown since its inception was -60.15%, which is greater than DOLE's maximum drawdown of -55.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TM and DOLE.

Drawdown Indicators

	TM	DOLE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.15%	-55.66%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	-15.88%	-13.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.92%	-27.70%	-7.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.20%	-17.20%	-12.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.99%	-21.53%	+0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.07%	7.68%	+3.39%

Volatility

TM vs. DOLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Toyota Motor Corporation (TM) is 7.08%, while Dole plc (DOLE) has a volatility of 8.79%. This indicates that TM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TM	DOLE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.08%	8.79%	-1.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.33%	16.43%	+3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.13%	25.82%	+3.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.91%	29.56%	-2.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.63%	29.56%	-5.93%

Dividends

TM vs. DOLE - Dividend Comparison

TM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than DOLE's 2.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DOLE Dole plc	1.86%	2.23%	2.36%	2.60%	3.32%	0.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TM Toyota Motor Corporation	1.63%	2.95%	2.81%	2.45%	2.90%	2.45%	2.74%	1.30%	3.40%	2.96%	3.23%	5.59%

Financials

TM vs. DOLE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Toyota Motor Corporation and Dole plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.94T and revenue of 12.83T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.

DOLE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dole plc reported a gross profit of 184.99M and revenue of 2.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.9%.

TM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported an operating income of 579.96B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

DOLE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dole plc reported an operating income of 61.96M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.7%.

TM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corporation reported a net income of 832.22B and revenue of 12.83T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.

DOLE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dole plc reported a net income of 80.10M and revenue of 2.34B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TM and DOLE in my portfolio?

TM and DOLE have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TM or DOLE?

DOLE has higher volatility (8.79%) compared to TM (7.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TM dropped -60.15% vs DOLE's -55.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DOLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.