PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TLV.TO having a 15.54% return and PZW.TO slightly higher at 15.70%. Over the past 10 years, TLV.TO has underperformed PZW.TO with an annualized return of 9.35%, while PZW.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.53% annualized return.


TLV.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
3.57%
YTD
15.54%
6M
15.89%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
21.94%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
9.35%

PZW.TO

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.40%
YTD
15.70%
6M
14.72%
1Y
32.76%
3Y*
21.00%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
15.54%22.51%20.36%4.75%-10.22%21.67%-6.10%22.29%-6.62%10.15%
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF
15.70%18.48%16.03%12.88%-10.53%17.53%7.48%18.01%-8.08%13.64%

Correlation

The correlation between TLV.TO and PZW.TO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2015

0.22

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLV.TO
PZW.TO

Real Estate

28.1%
8.8%

Financial Services

24.4%
13.3%

Utilities

12.1%
2.3%

Energy

9.6%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.6%
4.6%

Communication Services

6.6%
3.8%

Industrials

3.2%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
12.1%

Healthcare

1.7%
12.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%
7.0%

Technology

-

12.2%

Real Estate

TLV.TO
28.1%
PZW.TO
8.8%

Financial Services

TLV.TO
24.4%
PZW.TO
13.3%

Utilities

TLV.TO
12.1%
PZW.TO
2.3%

Energy

TLV.TO
9.6%
PZW.TO
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

TLV.TO
9.6%
PZW.TO
4.6%

Communication Services

TLV.TO
6.6%
PZW.TO
3.8%

Industrials

TLV.TO
3.2%
PZW.TO
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TLV.TO
3.1%
PZW.TO
12.1%

Healthcare

TLV.TO
1.7%
PZW.TO
12.7%

Basic Materials

TLV.TO
1.6%
PZW.TO
7.0%

Technology

TLV.TO

-

PZW.TO
12.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLV.TO
TLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

PZW.TO
PZW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLV.TOPZW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.45

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.01

3.87

+3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

32.41

13.82

+18.59

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the PZW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLV.TO and PZW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than PZW.TO's maximum drawdown of -32.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLV.TO and PZW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLV.TOPZW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-32.45%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-8.50%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.83%

-16.88%

+7.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-22.13%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

-32.45%

-5.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.67%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-5.72%

+1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.38%

-1.50%

Volatility

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) is 1.89%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF (PZW.TO) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that TLV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLV.TOPZW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

2.82%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.85%

10.41%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.42%

14.20%

-6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.95%

14.67%

-4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

15.91%

-3.23%

Dividends

TLV.TO vs. PZW.TO - Dividend Comparison

TLV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than PZW.TO's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PZW.TO
Invesco FTSE RAFI Global Small-Mid ETF
1.68%1.97%2.12%3.23%1.90%1.93%1.52%2.26%1.78%1.57%1.09%0.96%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
2.90%3.25%3.40%4.12%4.01%2.49%2.75%3.74%4.28%3.58%3.46%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLV.TO and PZW.TO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while PZW.TO is Global Equities. TLV.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index, while PZW.TO tracks 50% FTSE RAFI Developed ex US Mid-Small 1500 Index / 50% FTSE RAFI US 1500 Mid-Small Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLV.TO and PZW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer