PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLV.TO achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than ESGC.TO's 12.27% return.


TLV.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
9.97%
6M
12.07%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
8.58%

ESGC.TO

1D
-0.35%
1M
4.89%
YTD
12.27%
6M
14.01%
1Y
34.84%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
9.97%22.51%20.36%4.75%-10.22%21.67%2.03%
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF
12.27%32.85%18.64%7.50%-7.28%23.99%5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TLV.TO and ESGC.TO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLV.TO
TLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGC.TO
ESGC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ESGC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLV.TOESGC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.55

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.68

3.45

+2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.06

15.05

+11.01

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the ESGC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLV.TO and ESGC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLV.TOESGC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

2.82

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.09

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.26

-0.46

Drawdowns

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than ESGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -16.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLV.TO and ESGC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLV.TOESGC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-16.66%

-21.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-10.14%

+6.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.83%

-11.51%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-16.66%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-0.35%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-3.61%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

2.32%

-1.43%

Volatility

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) is 2.82%, while Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF (ESGC.TO) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that TLV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLV.TOESGC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

4.19%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

10.53%

-4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

12.40%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.94%

12.67%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

12.73%

-0.05%

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ESGC.TO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLV.TO vs. ESGC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TLV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than ESGC.TO's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ESGC.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index ETF
2.13%2.34%2.60%3.23%2.98%2.28%0.67%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
3.05%3.25%3.40%4.12%4.01%2.49%2.75%3.74%4.28%3.58%3.46%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLV.TO and ESGC.TO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESGC.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for TLV.TO.

TLV.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index, while ESGC.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for TLV.TO and 0.15% for ESGC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLV.TO and ESGC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer