PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLV.TO achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TLV.TO has underperformed CFOU.TO with an annualized return of 8.58%, while CFOU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.91% annualized return.


TLV.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.61%
YTD
9.97%
6M
12.07%
1Y
23.37%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
8.58%

CFOU.TO

1D
-1.41%
1M
9.71%
YTD
23.22%
6M
34.47%
1Y
88.95%
3Y*
57.23%
5Y*
28.45%
10Y*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
9.97%22.51%20.36%4.75%-10.22%21.67%-6.10%22.29%-6.62%10.15%
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
23.22%69.17%56.15%18.37%-23.64%79.61%-14.70%40.45%-21.67%22.44%

Correlation

The correlation between TLV.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2012

0.60

The correlation between TLV.TO and CFOU.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TLV.TO
CFOU.TO

Real Estate

27.8%

-

Financial Services

24.5%
100.0%

Utilities

14.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.5%

-

Energy

7.8%

-

Communication Services

6.4%

-

Industrials

3.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%

-

Healthcare

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Technology

-

-

Real Estate

TLV.TO
27.8%
CFOU.TO

-

Financial Services

TLV.TO
24.5%
CFOU.TO
100.0%

Utilities

TLV.TO
14.3%
CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

TLV.TO
9.5%
CFOU.TO

-

Energy

TLV.TO
7.8%
CFOU.TO

-

Communication Services

TLV.TO
6.4%
CFOU.TO

-

Industrials

TLV.TO
3.2%
CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

TLV.TO
3.1%
CFOU.TO

-

Healthcare

TLV.TO
1.7%
CFOU.TO

-

Basic Materials

TLV.TO
1.5%
CFOU.TO

-

Technology

TLV.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLV.TO
TLV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLV.TOCFOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.57

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.68

5.56

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.06

22.74

+3.33

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is comparable to the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLV.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLV.TOCFOU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

3.62

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

1.04

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.68

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.33

+0.46

Drawdowns

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLV.TO and CFOU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLV.TOCFOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.68%

-86.23%

+48.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-16.08%

+12.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.83%

-24.95%

+15.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.36%

-45.23%

+25.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.68%

-67.29%

+29.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-3.23%

+1.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-22.46%

+18.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

3.93%

-3.04%

Volatility

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) is 2.82%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that TLV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLV.TOCFOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

8.18%

-5.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

20.93%

-15.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.38%

24.70%

-17.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.94%

27.56%

-17.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.68%

33.85%

-21.17%

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

TLV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLV.TO
Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF
3.05%3.25%3.40%4.12%4.01%2.49%2.75%3.74%4.28%3.58%3.46%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLV.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TLV.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TLV.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

TLV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. TLV.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index, while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for TLV.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLV.TO and CFOU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer