TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO
TLV.TO (Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF) and CDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index, while CDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. TLV.TO is passively managed, while CDAY.NEO is actively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLV.TO charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for CDAY.NEO.
Performance
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLV.TO achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than CDAY.NEO's 13.70% return.
TLV.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 12.07%
- 1Y
- 23.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
CDAY.NEO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TLV.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF | 9.97% | 9.31% |
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 13.70% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLV.TO and CDAY.NEO is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.62 |
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Real Estate
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Technology
-
Real Estate
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Financial Services
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Utilities
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Consumer Defensive
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Energy
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Communication Services
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Industrials
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Consumer Cyclical
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Healthcare
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Basic Materials
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
Technology
TLV.TO
-
CDAY.NEO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
TLV.TO
CDAY.NEO
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF (TLV.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF (CDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 3.03 | -2.24 |
Drawdowns
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLV.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.68%, which is greater than CDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -8.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLV.TO and CDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.68% | -8.00% | -29.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.36% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.52% | -0.83% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -1.02% | -3.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLV.TO | CDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.78% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.38% | 11.37% | -3.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.94% | 11.37% | -1.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.68% | 11.37% | +1.31% |
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLV.TO has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLV.TO vs. CDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
TLV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than CDAY.NEO's 14.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced Canadian Equity DayMAX ETF | 14.55% | 7.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLV.TO Invesco S&P/TSX Composite Low Volatility Index ETF | 3.05% | 3.25% | 3.40% | 4.12% | 4.01% | 2.49% | 2.75% | 3.74% | 4.28% | 3.58% | 3.46% | 4.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLV.TO and CDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TLV.TO is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TLV.TO is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for CDAY.NEO.
TLV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for TLV.TO and 0.85% for CDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for TLV.TO and CDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer