TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L).

TLTI.L and 3NVD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TLTI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025. 3NVD.L is a passively managed fund by Leverage Shares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX Leveraged 3X NVDA Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020.

Performance

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP	-2.31%	-0.47%
3NVD.L Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP	-27.91%	32.86%

Different Trading Currencies

TLTI.L is traded in USD, while 3NVD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 3NVD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLTI.L achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly higher than 3NVD.L's -27.91% return.

TLTI.L

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -3.72%
• YTD: -2.31%
• 6M: -4.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

3NVD.L

• 1D: 10.04%
• 1M: -11.98%
• YTD: -27.91%
• 6M: -36.00%
• 1Y: 119.20%
• 3Y*: 172.27%
• 5Y*: 88.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLTI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 3NVD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

3NVD.L

Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP

TLTI.L

IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP

Return for Risk

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

3NVD.L

3NVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
3NVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
3NVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
3NVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 59
3NVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
3NVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L) and Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP (3NVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLTI.L	3NVD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.34	0.62	-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between TLTI.L and 3NVD.L is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L - Dividend Comparison

TLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while 3NVD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP	0.07%	0.02%
3NVD.L Leverage Shares 3x NVIDIA ETP Securities GBP	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TLTI.L vs. 3NVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLTI.L drawdown since its inception was -10.31%, smaller than the maximum 3NVD.L drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTI.L and 3NVD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLTI.L	3NVD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.31%	-98.48%	+88.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-58.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-98.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.28%	-62.73%	+54.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.90%	-53.33%	+49.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.09%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLTI.L	3NVD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	24.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	75.59%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.49%	114.65%	-104.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	148.42%	-137.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.49%	149.44%	-138.95%