TLTE vs. MFEM
TLTE (FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index) and MFEM (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - TLTE tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index while MFEM tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLTE returned 7.25%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for MFEM. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TLTE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MFEM.
Performance
TLTE vs. MFEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTE achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly lower than MFEM's 18.30% return.
TLTE
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 6.23%
- YTD
- 15.71%
- 1Y
- 30.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.25%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.51%
MFEM
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- 6M
- 8.33%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.14%
- 5Y*
- 7.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $573.81K | $436.75K | $631.39K | |
| $291.32K | $272.95K | $346.48K |
TLTE vs. MFEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 15.71% | 30.21% | 3.53% | 13.62% | -17.31% | 4.79% | 12.10% | 14.51% | -17.44% | 7.02% |
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 18.30% | 25.33% | 4.73% | 15.14% | -19.50% | 10.77% | 11.33% | 15.26% | -14.64% | 4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTE and MFEM is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017 | 0.93 |
The correlation between TLTE and MFEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
TLTE vs. MFEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLTE
MFEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
TLTE
MFEM
Financial Services
TLTE
MFEM
Industrials
TLTE
MFEM
Consumer Cyclical
TLTE
MFEM
Basic Materials
TLTE
MFEM
Communication Services
TLTE
MFEM
Real Estate
TLTE
MFEM
Consumer Defensive
TLTE
MFEM
Energy
TLTE
MFEM
Healthcare
TLTE
MFEM
Utilities
TLTE
MFEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTE vs. MFEM — Risk / Return Rank
TLTE
MFEM
TLTE vs. MFEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTE | MFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.27 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 2.14 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.13 | 6.27 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTE vs. MFEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTE drawdown since its inception was -44.21%, roughly equal to the maximum MFEM drawdown of -43.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTE and MFEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTE | MFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.21% | -43.32% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.04% | -15.05% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.43% | -19.22% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.97% | -30.78% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.55% | -11.06% | +2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.08% | -11.43% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 5.12% | -0.83% |
Volatility
TLTE vs. MFEM - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index (TLTE) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (MFEM) at 7.69%. This indicates that TLTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTE | MFEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.36% | 7.69% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.72% | 20.65% | +0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 22.70% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.76% | 17.43% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 19.70% | -0.97% |
TLTE vs. MFEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than MFEM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTE vs. MFEM - Dividend Comparison
TLTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than MFEM's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFEM PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.33% | 2.77% | 5.89% | 4.01% | 7.01% | 29.96% | 1.70% | 2.37% | 1.18% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLTE FlexShares Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index | 3.38% | 3.76% | 3.73% | 4.03% | 4.42% | 3.21% | 1.95% | 3.23% | 3.02% | 2.12% | 2.30% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TLTE and MFEM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TLTE has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to MFEM (7.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTE dropped -44.21% vs MFEM's -43.32%.
On 5-year performance, TLTE leads with 7.25% vs 7.15% for MFEM. On fees, MFEM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MFEM has been the lower-risk option at 7.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TLTE has performed better with a 7.25% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MFEM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TLTE.
TLTE has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.33% for MFEM.
TLTE tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Factor Tilt Index, while MFEM tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Emerging Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TLTE and 0.49% for MFEM.
MFEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTE and MFEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer