TLTD vs. UFO
TLTD (FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt) and UFO (Procure Space ETF) are both Global Equities funds - TLTD tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index while UFO tracks the S-Network Space Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLTD returned 10.43%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for UFO. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TLTD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UFO.
Performance
TLTD vs. UFO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLTD achieves a 11.20% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 17.74% return.
TLTD
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 5.50%
- YTD
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 27.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
UFO
- 1D
- 3.79%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 17.74%
- 1Y
- 54.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.13%
- 5Y*
- 10.61%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $470.57K | $675.01K | $784.22K | |
| $26.10M | $26.53M | $70.91M |
TLTD vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 11.20% | 39.69% | 4.78% | 17.19% | -13.74% | 12.84% | 4.21% | 8.33% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 17.74% | 67.36% | 27.22% | -2.34% | -25.85% | 7.17% | -2.15% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLTD and UFO is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2019 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TLTD and UFO shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TLTD vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TLTD
UFO
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TLTD
UFO
Industrials
TLTD
UFO
Consumer Cyclical
TLTD
UFO
-
Basic Materials
TLTD
UFO
-
Technology
TLTD
UFO
Healthcare
TLTD
UFO
-
Energy
TLTD
UFO
-
Consumer Defensive
TLTD
UFO
-
Real Estate
TLTD
UFO
-
Communication Services
TLTD
UFO
Utilities
TLTD
UFO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLTD vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank
TLTD
UFO
TLTD vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLTD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 1.50 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.35 | 4.02 | +4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLTD vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLTD drawdown since its inception was -40.62%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLTD and UFO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLTD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.62% | -50.33% | +9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -36.71% | +24.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.10% | -36.71% | +23.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.96% | -49.95% | +20.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -32.89% | +32.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -21.97% | +14.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 13.68% | -10.42% |
Volatility
TLTD vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt (TLTD) is 4.05%, while Procure Space ETF (UFO) has a volatility of 8.94%. This indicates that TLTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UFO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLTD | UFO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 8.94% | -4.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 32.80% | -20.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.91% | 41.96% | -27.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 30.95% | -14.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 31.26% | -14.72% |
TLTD vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLTD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLTD vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison
TLTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than UFO's 0.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLTD FlexShares Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt | 3.29% | 3.44% | 3.88% | 3.39% | 2.76% | 3.44% | 2.04% | 3.46% | 3.16% | 2.71% | 2.93% | 2.56% |
UFO Procure Space ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 1.98% | 1.90% | 3.19% | 1.00% | 1.07% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLTD and UFO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UFO has higher volatility (8.94%) compared to TLTD (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLTD dropped -40.62% vs UFO's -50.33%.
On 5-year performance, UFO leads with 10.61% vs 10.43% for TLTD. On fees, TLTD is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, TLTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UFO has performed better with a 10.61% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLTD is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.
TLTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.33% for UFO.
TLTD tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Factor Tilt Index, while UFO tracks S-Network Space Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Procure. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for TLTD and 0.75% for UFO.
TLTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLTD and UFO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer