TLMIX vs. LSMSX
TLMIX (Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund) and LSMSX (Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, TLMIX returned 1.60%/yr vs 1.20%/yr for LSMSX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLMIX charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for LSMSX.
Performance
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLMIX achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than LSMSX's 2.18% return.
TLMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.60%
- 10Y*
- 1.33%
LSMSX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 8.53%
- 3Y*
- 4.03%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- —
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLMIX Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund | 1.01% | 3.74% | 2.75% | 3.25% | -2.46% | -0.05% | 1.00% | 2.12% | 1.26% | 0.84% |
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 2.18% | 3.22% | 2.22% | 7.96% | -10.03% | 4.11% | 4.48% | 8.16% | 0.46% | 4.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLMIX and LSMSX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.47 |
The correlation between TLMIX and LSMSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLMIX vs. LSMSX — Risk / Return Rank
TLMIX
LSMSX
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) and Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLMIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.04 | 1.72 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 2.99 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.26 | 10.07 | +2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLMIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.95 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.27 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.63 | +0.46 |
Drawdowns
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLMIX drawdown since its inception was -4.15%, smaller than the maximum LSMSX drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLMIX and LSMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLMIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -15.00% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.00% | -2.82% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.17% | -7.49% | +6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.15% | -15.00% | +10.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -4.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.23% | +0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.48% | -2.85% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.84% | -0.56% |
Volatility
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund (TLMIX) is 0.44%, while Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund (LSMSX) has a volatility of 1.22%. This indicates that TLMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLMIX | LSMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 1.22% | -0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 2.07% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21% | 2.88% | -1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.37% | 4.49% | -3.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.16% | 4.51% | -3.35% |
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLMIX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LSMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLMIX vs. LSMSX - Dividend Comparison
TLMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than LSMSX's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSMSX Western Asset SMASh Series TF Fund | 3.86% | 3.83% | 4.30% | 3.37% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.33% | 2.55% | 2.34% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLMIX Thornburg Short Duration Municipal Fund | 3.23% | 3.25% | 3.30% | 2.34% | 1.15% | 0.44% | 1.07% | 1.45% | 1.33% | 0.99% | 0.47% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLMIX and LSMSX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSMSX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to TLMIX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLMIX dropped -4.15% vs LSMSX's -15.00%.
LSMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLMIX and LSMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer