PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLLVX vs. NQCRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund (TLLVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLLVX achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than NQCRX's 15.56% return.


TLLVX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.71%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.76%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
10.79%
10Y*

NQCRX

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.47%
YTD
15.56%
6M
16.92%
1Y
37.02%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
14.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TLLVX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund
10.59%17.31%14.75%14.29%-7.21%26.84%3.99%14.67%
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
15.56%22.44%17.74%13.76%-1.07%25.38%-0.27%26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TLLVX and NQCRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2019

0.94

The correlation between TLLVX and NQCRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLLVX vs. NQCRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLLVX
TLLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TLLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TLLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NQCRX
NQCRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
NQCRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NQCRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
NQCRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NQCRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NQCRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund (TLLVX) and Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLLVXNQCRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

6.03

-2.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.85

22.46

-8.61

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the NQCRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLLVX and NQCRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLLVXNQCRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.96

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.88

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.39

+0.28

Drawdowns

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLLVX drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, smaller than the maximum NQCRX drawdown of -57.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLVX and NQCRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLLVXNQCRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-57.85%

+19.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-6.07%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-17.21%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.32%

-17.61%

-2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.22%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.70%

-10.01%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

1.62%

+0.20%

Volatility

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund (TLLVX) is 2.82%, while Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund (NQCRX) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that TLLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQCRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLLVXNQCRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.82%

3.78%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

9.51%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.82%

12.38%

-1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

15.60%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.50%

18.93%

+0.57%

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLLVX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than NQCRX's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLLVX vs. NQCRX - Dividend Comparison

TLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than NQCRX's 6.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NQCRX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund
6.32%7.30%6.82%2.22%4.63%20.85%17.95%26.88%34.12%27.42%10.74%61.01%
TLLVX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund
7.63%8.44%8.50%2.97%5.76%1.29%1.80%6.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TLLVX and NQCRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NQCRX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to TLLVX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLLVX dropped -38.31% vs NQCRX's -57.85%.

NQCRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLLVX and NQCRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer