PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLLVX vs. LSVVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund (TLLVX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLLVX achieves a 16.74% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 19.11% return.


TLLVX

1D
0.66%
1M
3.29%
6M
11.88%
YTD
16.74%
1Y
26.96%
3Y*
18.78%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*

LSVVX

1D
0.66%
1M
2.94%
6M
16.07%
YTD
19.11%
1Y
34.76%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TLLVX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund
16.74%17.31%14.75%14.29%-7.21%26.84%3.99%14.67%
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
19.11%19.63%3.97%12.19%-4.02%28.57%-3.46%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TLLVX and LSVVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.94

The correlation between TLLVX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLLVX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLLVX
TLLVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TLLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TLLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LSVVX
LSVVX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LSVVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund (TLLVX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLLVXLSVVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.58

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

5.71

-2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

21.75

-6.68

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the LSVVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLLVX and LSVVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLLVX drawdown since its inception was -38.31%, smaller than the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLVX and LSVVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLLVXLSVVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.31%

-61.62%

+23.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.38%

-6.23%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-24.61%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.32%

-24.61%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-12.12%

+7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.63%

+0.18%

Volatility

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund (TLLVX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) at 2.39%. This indicates that TLLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLLVXLSVVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

2.39%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.73%

8.18%

+0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

11.14%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.65%

15.87%

-1.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.41%

18.41%

+1.00%

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLLVX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLLVX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison

TLLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, less than LSVVX's 11.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSVVX
LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund
11.49%13.69%2.45%6.57%5.41%3.67%2.40%21.48%3.91%1.98%2.37%2.38%
TLLVX
TIAA-CREF Life Funds Large-Cap Value Fund
7.23%8.44%8.50%2.97%5.76%1.29%1.80%6.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, TLLVX and LSVVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TLLVX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to LSVVX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLLVX dropped -38.31% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.

LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLLVX and LSVVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer