TLLIX vs. VNQ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

TLLIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund) and VNQ (Vanguard Real Estate ETF) are both funds - TLLIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by TIAA Investments, while VNQ is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Real Estate 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, TLLIX returned 11.83%/yr vs 5.11%/yr for VNQ. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLLIX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VNQ.

Performance

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLLIX achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly lower than VNQ's 15.30% return. Over the past 10 years, TLLIX has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 11.83%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.11% annualized return.

TLLIX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.10%
• 6M: 8.49%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 1Y: 22.06%
• 3Y*: 17.56%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

VNQ

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 2.95%
• 6M: 11.51%
• YTD: 15.30%
• 1Y: 15.69%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: 2.86%
• 10Y*: 5.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund	11.26%	20.75%	15.17%	20.53%	-17.52%	17.12%	17.20%	26.04%	-7.05%	19.20%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	15.30%	3.24%	4.81%	11.85%	-26.25%	40.54%	-4.61%	28.91%	-6.03%	4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between TLLIX and VNQ is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2009	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between TLLIX and VNQ has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TLLIX vs. VNQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLLIX

TLLIX Risk / Return Rank: 69
TLLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TLLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TLLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
TLLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
TLLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

VNQ

VNQ Risk / Return Rank: 40
VNQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
VNQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
VNQ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
VNQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
VNQ Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLLIX	VNQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	1.13	+0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	1.62	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.20	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	1.89	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.03	5.93	+5.10

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is higher than the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLLIX and VNQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLLIX drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLIX and VNQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLLIX	VNQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.41%	-73.07%	+41.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.79%	-8.34%	-0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.90%	-17.46%	+2.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.38%	-34.48%	+9.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.41%	-42.40%	+10.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	0.00%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-13.56%	+9.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.65%	-0.60%

Volatility

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) is 3.80%, while Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) has a volatility of 5.28%. This indicates that TLLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLLIX	VNQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.80%	5.28%	-1.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.27%	10.84%	-0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.29%	14.00%	-1.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.62%	18.91%	-4.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.48%	20.75%	-5.27%

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLLIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TLLIX vs. VNQ - Dividend Comparison

TLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than VNQ's 3.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TLLIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund	2.81%	3.12%	2.26%	2.17%	2.35%	2.29%	1.71%	2.25%	2.67%	0.15%	2.57%	0.27%
VNQ Vanguard Real Estate ETF	3.47%	3.92%	3.85%	3.95%	3.91%	2.56%	3.93%	3.39%	4.74%	4.23%	4.82%	3.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLLIX and VNQ in my portfolio?

TLLIX and VNQ have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLLIX or VNQ?

VNQ has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to TLLIX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLLIX dropped -31.41% vs VNQ's -73.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.