TLLIX vs. VNQ

In the year-to-date period, TLLIX achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than VNQ's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, TLLIX has outperformed VNQ with an annualized return of 8.75%, while VNQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.32% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TLLIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQ's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) and Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TLLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is comparable to the VNQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLLIX and VNQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TLLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than VNQ's 4.07% yield.

The maximum TLLIX drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, smaller than the maximum VNQ drawdown of -73.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLLIX and VNQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2050 Fund (TLLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to Vanguard Real Estate ETF (VNQ) at 5.01%. This indicates that TLLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.