PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLF.TO returned 21.83%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for TXF.TO. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLF.TO achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than TXF.TO's 20.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TLF.TO has outperformed TXF.TO with an annualized return of 21.83%, while TXF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.45% annualized return.

TLF.TO

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.87%
6M
25.65%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
38.85%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
21.83%

TXF.TO

1D
-1.98%
1M
-7.43%
6M
18.40%
YTD
20.80%
1Y
42.15%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
15.76%
10Y*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		27.21%18.20%21.45%49.36%-30.09%31.51%38.89%37.12%3.76%37.68%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common		20.80%24.80%18.69%60.80%-35.54%26.82%32.50%26.56%-6.78%33.65%

Correlation

The correlation between TLF.TO and TXF.TO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2011

0.64

Over the past year, TLF.TO and TXF.TO have become more correlated (0.93) than their long-term average of 0.64, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF

CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common

Often compared with TXF.TO:
TXF.TO vs. QQQY.TOTXF.TO vs. HDIV.TOTXF.TO vs. QQCL.TOTXF.TO vs. XEQT.TOTXF.TO vs. HXQ.TOTXF.TO vs. HTAE.TOTXF.TO vs. VFV.TO

Return for Risk

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TLF.TO
TLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
TXF.TO
TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TLF.TOTXF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60
1.73

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.04
2.17

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.74

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

9.24

-0.05

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLF.TO and TXF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, smaller than the maximum TXF.TO drawdown of -41.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and TXF.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TLF.TOTXF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.19%

-41.23%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.73%

-15.43%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.99%

-27.38%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-41.23%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

-41.23%

+4.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-8.31%

+1.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-6.17%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

4.57%

-0.33%

Volatility

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.38% compared to CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) at 12.16%. This indicates that TLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TLF.TOTXF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.38%

12.16%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.66%

21.48%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.42%

24.54%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.80%

25.44%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

23.91%

+0.29%

Dividends

TLF.TO vs. TXF.TO - Dividend Comparison

TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than TXF.TO's 9.40% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		5.41%5.90%5.86%5.31%6.97%3.40%3.49%4.64%6.05%5.94%7.67%7.63%
TXF.TO
CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common		9.40%10.59%9.75%7.48%14.13%7.77%11.01%7.29%9.29%4.89%6.16%6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.93, TLF.TO and TXF.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

They also come from different issuers: Brompton and CI Investments.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and TXF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer