TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO
TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and TECH.TO (Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD) are both Technology Equities funds. TLF.TO is actively managed, while TECH.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TLF.TO returned 17.07%/yr vs 13.50%/yr for TECH.TO. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLF.TO achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than TECH.TO's 1.30% return.
TLF.TO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- 6M
- 25.65%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 38.85%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 17.07%
- 10Y*
- 21.83%
TECH.TO
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 2.94%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 9.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- —
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 27.21% | 18.20% | 21.45% | 49.36% | -30.09% | 22.34% |
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD | 1.30% | 18.19% | 40.22% | 80.38% | -43.52% | 20.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLF.TO and TECH.TO is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2021 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TLF.TO and TECH.TO has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TLF.TO
TECH.TO
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLF.TO | TECH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.10 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | 0.57 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 1.57 | +7.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, smaller than the maximum TECH.TO drawdown of -47.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and TECH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLF.TO | TECH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.19% | -47.92% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -16.60% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.99% | -24.14% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | -47.92% | +10.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.84% | -3.80% | -3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -12.22% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 5.98% | -1.74% |
Volatility
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.38% compared to Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD (TECH.TO) at 8.26%. This indicates that TLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TECH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLF.TO | TECH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.38% | 8.26% | +5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.66% | 15.11% | +6.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 19.12% | +5.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 26.77% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 26.46% | -2.26% |
Dividends
TLF.TO vs. TECH.TO - Dividend Comparison
TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than TECH.TO's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TECH.TO Evolve FANGMA Index ETF Hedged CAD | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.12% | 0.20% | 0.35% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 5.41% | 5.90% | 5.86% | 5.31% | 6.97% | 3.40% | 3.49% | 4.64% | 6.05% | 5.94% | 7.67% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLF.TO and TECH.TO have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Evolve.
Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and TECH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer