TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO
TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and PAYG.TO (Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLF.TO is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Brompton, while PAYG.TO is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by Brompton. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLF.TO
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -3.87%
- 6M
- 25.65%
- YTD
- 27.21%
- 1Y
- 38.85%
- 3Y*
- 26.00%
- 5Y*
- 17.07%
- 10Y*
- 21.83%
PAYG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 34.83% |
PAYG.TO Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF | 11.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLF.TO and PAYG.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TLF.TO
PAYG.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF (PAYG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLF.TO | PAYG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, which is greater than PAYG.TO's maximum drawdown of -7.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and PAYG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLF.TO | PAYG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.19% | -7.38% | -29.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.84% | -3.72% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -2.42% | -4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | — | — |
Volatility
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLF.TO | PAYG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.38% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 21.14% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.80% | 21.14% | +4.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.20% | 21.14% | +3.06% |
Dividends
TLF.TO vs. PAYG.TO - Dividend Comparison
TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than PAYG.TO's 4.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAYG.TO Brompton Global Equity HighPay ETF | 4.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 5.41% | 5.90% | 5.86% | 5.31% | 6.97% | 3.40% | 3.49% | 4.64% | 6.05% | 5.94% | 7.67% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLF.TO and PAYG.TO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TLF.TO is categorized as Technology Equities, while PAYG.TO is Global Equity Income.
Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and PAYG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer