TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO
TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and MSFH.TO (Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TLF.TO returned 35.54% vs -15.13% for MSFH.TO. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLF.TO achieves a 23.03% return, which is significantly higher than MSFH.TO's -13.55% return.
TLF.TO
- 1D
- -3.28%
- 1M
- -5.50%
- 6M
- 20.92%
- YTD
- 23.03%
- 1Y
- 35.54%
- 3Y*
- 24.16%
- 5Y*
- 16.29%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
MSFH.TO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- -9.96%
- YTD
- -13.55%
- 1Y
- -15.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 23.03% | 18.20% | 4.47% |
MSFH.TO Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | -13.55% | 6.58% | 5.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLF.TO and MSFH.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024 | 0.43 |
The correlation between TLF.TO and MSFH.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (1 year) to 0.43 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
TLF.TO
MSFH.TO
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (MSFH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLF.TO | MSFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.91 | +0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | -0.49 | +2.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.32 | -0.89 | +9.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, which is greater than MSFH.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and MSFH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLF.TO | MSFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.19% | -31.00% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.73% | -31.00% | +16.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.90% | -22.12% | +12.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.35% | -9.89% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 17.17% | -12.89% |
Volatility
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.68% compared to Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (MSFH.TO) at 10.93%. This indicates that TLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSFH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLF.TO | MSFH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.68% | 10.93% | +2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 21.82% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.64% | 24.39% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.84% | 23.47% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.22% | 23.47% | +0.75% |
Dividends
TLF.TO vs. MSFH.TO - Dividend Comparison
TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.60%, less than MSFH.TO's 18.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSFH.TO Harvest Microsoft High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 18.88% | 14.88% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLF.TO Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF | 5.60% | 5.90% | 5.86% | 5.31% | 6.97% | 3.40% | 3.49% | 4.64% | 6.05% | 5.94% | 7.67% | 7.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLF.TO and MSFH.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Harvest.
Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and MSFH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer