PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

TLF.TO (Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF) and HTA.TO (Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, TLF.TO returned 21.83%/yr vs 20.15%/yr for HTA.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLF.TO achieves a 27.21% return, which is significantly higher than HTA.TO's 20.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TLF.TO has outperformed HTA.TO with an annualized return of 21.83%, while HTA.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.15% annualized return.

TLF.TO

1D
-1.40%
1M
-3.87%
6M
25.65%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
38.85%
3Y*
26.00%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
21.83%

HTA.TO

1D
-1.30%
1M
-3.16%
6M
21.40%
YTD
20.95%
1Y
30.00%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
15.61%
10Y*
20.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		27.21%18.20%21.45%49.36%-30.09%31.51%38.89%37.12%3.76%37.68%
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF		20.95%12.42%23.53%52.86%-32.21%41.99%30.02%32.53%-0.71%34.20%

Correlation

The correlation between TLF.TO and HTA.TO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2015

0.72

Over the past year, TLF.TO and HTA.TO have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF

Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF

Often compared with HTA.TO:
HTA.TO vs. HTAE.TOHTA.TO vs. VGG.TOHTA.TO vs. ZWT.TOHTA.TO vs. TEC.TOHTA.TO vs. QMAX.TOHTA.TO vs. MTRX.TOHTA.TO vs. DIV.TO

Return for Risk

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TLF.TO
TLF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
HTA.TO
HTA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) and Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

TLF.TOHTA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.60
1.39

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.04
1.86

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.03

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

6.44

+2.75

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the HTA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLF.TO and HTA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLF.TO drawdown since its inception was -37.19%, roughly equal to the maximum HTA.TO drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLF.TO and HTA.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TLF.TOHTA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.19%

-38.77%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.73%

-14.87%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.99%

-25.02%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.19%

-38.77%

+1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.19%

-38.77%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.84%

-5.07%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-8.26%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.24%

4.67%

-0.43%

Volatility

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF (TLF.TO) has a higher volatility of 13.38% compared to Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF (HTA.TO) at 10.27%. This indicates that TLF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TLF.TOHTA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.38%

10.27%

+3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.66%

18.94%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.42%

21.64%

+2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.80%

24.16%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.20%

23.31%

+0.89%

Dividends

TLF.TO vs. HTA.TO - Dividend Comparison

TLF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, less than HTA.TO's 8.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTA.TO
Harvest Tech Achievers Growth & Income ETF		8.19%8.80%8.11%7.81%9.99%3.96%5.52%6.15%7.61%7.03%8.74%5.29%
TLF.TO
Brompton Tech Leaders Income ETF		5.41%5.90%5.86%5.31%6.97%3.40%3.49%4.64%6.05%5.94%7.67%7.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.92, TLF.TO and HTA.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

They also come from different issuers: Brompton and Harvest.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLF.TO and HTA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer