TLDIX vs. FZOLX
TLDIX (Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund) and FZOLX (Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, TLDIX returned 3.40%/yr vs 3.53%/yr for FZOLX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLDIX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for FZOLX.
Performance
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TLDIX having a 1.42% return and FZOLX slightly lower at 1.36%.
TLDIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 4.19%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- 3.40%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
FZOLX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 4.26%
- 3Y*
- 5.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLDIX Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund | 1.42% | 4.84% | 5.81% | 4.92% | -0.00% | 0.32% | 0.52% |
FZOLX Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund | 1.36% | 4.85% | 5.59% | 5.72% | 0.34% | -0.04% | 0.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLDIX and FZOLX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLDIX vs. FZOLX — Risk / Return Rank
TLDIX
FZOLX
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) and Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund (FZOLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLDIX | FZOLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.55 | 3.36 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 15.07 | 10.53 | +4.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.43 | 3.63 | +1.80 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 17.12 | 14.30 | +2.81 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 83.37 | 74.84 | +8.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLDIX | FZOLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.55 | 3.36 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.61 | 2.91 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 2.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.09 | 2.72 | -0.63 |
Drawdowns
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLDIX drawdown since its inception was -3.43%, which is greater than FZOLX's maximum drawdown of -1.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLDIX and FZOLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLDIX | FZOLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.43% | -1.10% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.25% | -0.30% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.25% | -0.30% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.39% | -1.10% | -0.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -3.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.16% | -0.13% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.05% | 0.06% | -0.01% |
Volatility
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund (TLDIX) is 0.14%, while Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund (FZOLX) has a volatility of 0.38%. This indicates that TLDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZOLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLDIX | FZOLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.14% | 0.38% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.62% | 0.88% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19% | 1.27% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.31% | 1.22% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.26% | 1.15% | +0.11% |
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLDIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FZOLX's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLDIX vs. FZOLX - Dividend Comparison
TLDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, less than FZOLX's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FZOLX Fidelity SAI Low Duration Income Fund | 5.09% | 5.26% | 5.15% | 4.03% | 1.14% | 0.16% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLDIX Thornburg Ultra Short Income Fund | 4.44% | 4.89% | 5.64% | 4.12% | 2.12% | 1.53% | 2.32% | 2.82% | 2.37% | 1.62% | 1.24% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLDIX and FZOLX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FZOLX has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to TLDIX (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLDIX dropped -3.43% vs FZOLX's -1.10%.
TLDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 3.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TLDIX and FZOLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer