TLAFX vs. RESGX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

TLAFX (Transamerica Large Core Fund) and RESGX (Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TLAFX returned 14.48%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for RESGX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TLAFX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RESGX.

Performance

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLAFX achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 22.17% return. Over the past 10 years, TLAFX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 14.48%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.29% annualized return.

TLAFX

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.97%
• 6M: 9.34%
• YTD: 10.99%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: 18.81%
• 5Y*: 12.92%
• 10Y*: 14.48%
• ALL TIME*: 13.70%

RESGX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.46%
• 6M: 15.58%
• YTD: 22.17%
• 1Y: 34.58%
• 3Y*: 15.83%
• 5Y*: 9.18%
• 10Y*: 12.29%
• ALL TIME*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TLAFX Transamerica Large Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLAFX Transamerica Large Core Fund	10.99%	17.56%	22.59%	25.87%	-16.76%	29.74%	15.30%	26.68%	-7.19%	22.57%
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	22.17%	10.30%	11.40%	15.59%	-14.71%	26.58%	9.57%	24.25%	-6.47%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TLAFX and RESGX is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.91

Over the past year, the correlation between TLAFX and RESGX has dropped to 0.70 - well below their long-term average of 0.91, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TLAFX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLAFX

TLAFX Risk / Return Rank: 62
TLAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TLAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
TLAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TLAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
TLAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

RESGX

RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 88
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLAFX	RESGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.22	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.10	-0.85
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	4.22	-1.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.92	13.29	-3.37

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLAFX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum RESGX drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLAFX and RESGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLAFX	RESGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.94%	-37.80%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-7.84%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.84%	-20.50%	+1.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.72%	-23.58%	-7.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.94%	-37.80%	+3.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-4.49%	+4.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.38%	-4.98%	-0.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.51%	-0.47%

Volatility

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) have volatilities of 3.54% and 3.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLAFX	RESGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	3.58%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.99%	11.33%	-1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.64%	14.96%	-2.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.60%	17.31%	+2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	18.65%	+0.78%

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLAFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLAFX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

TLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than RESGX's 6.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RESGX Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio	6.98%	8.24%	13.38%	9.08%	8.17%	9.98%	0.82%	1.90%	5.09%	0.94%	0.72%
TLAFX Transamerica Large Core Fund	14.18%	15.89%	23.39%	7.88%	6.40%	16.53%	9.17%	1.44%	22.85%	4.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLAFX and RESGX in my portfolio?

TLAFX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TLAFX or RESGX?

RESGX has higher volatility (3.58%) compared to TLAFX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLAFX dropped -33.94% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.