PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLAFX vs. RCKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLAFX achieves a 10.99% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 20.94% return. Over the past 10 years, TLAFX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 14.48%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.


TLAFX

1D
0.65%
1M
0.97%
6M
9.34%
YTD
10.99%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
18.81%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
14.48%
ALL TIME*
13.70%

RCKSX

1D
0.08%
1M
1.85%
6M
14.25%
YTD
20.94%
1Y
27.07%
3Y*
19.11%
5Y*
8.94%
10Y*
11.36%
ALL TIME*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TLAFX
Transamerica Large Core Fund
10.99%17.56%22.59%25.87%-16.76%29.74%15.30%26.68%-7.19%22.57%
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
20.94%12.99%15.12%15.57%-18.09%9.96%13.75%19.05%-2.14%22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TLAFX and RCKSX is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.85

Over the past year, the correlation between TLAFX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLAFX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TLAFX
TLAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TLAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TLAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

RCKSX
RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLAFXRCKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

6.32

-4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

20.66

-10.74

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLAFX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, smaller than the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLAFX and RCKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAFXRCKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-57.88%

+23.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-4.14%

-4.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-18.22%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.72%

-22.54%

-8.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.94%

-33.10%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.20%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-9.44%

+4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.04%

1.26%

+0.78%

Volatility

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 2.53%. This indicates that TLAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAFXRCKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.53%

+1.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

7.56%

+2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

11.35%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

15.56%

+4.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.39%

+2.04%

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLAFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLAFX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

TLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.18%, more than RCKSX's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RCKSX
Rock Oak Core Growth Fund
5.17%6.26%0.47%0.71%1.00%4.31%16.56%3.18%0.59%5.91%0.70%3.21%
TLAFX
Transamerica Large Core Fund
14.18%15.89%23.39%7.88%6.40%16.53%9.17%1.44%22.85%4.89%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLAFX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLAFX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to RCKSX (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLAFX dropped -33.94% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

RCKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLAFX and RCKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer