PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLAFX vs. AMFEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLAFX achieves a 10.98% return, which is significantly lower than AMFEX's 13.36% return.


TLAFX

1D
0.08%
1M
6.31%
YTD
10.98%
6M
11.55%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
14.66%

AMFEX

1D
0.90%
1M
4.82%
YTD
13.36%
6M
13.44%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TLAFX
Transamerica Large Core Fund
10.98%17.56%22.59%25.87%-16.76%29.74%15.30%26.68%-10.94%
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
13.36%17.33%16.28%17.32%-14.08%22.58%12.70%24.62%-9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TLAFX and AMFEX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2018

0.96

The correlation between TLAFX and AMFEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.96 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLAFX vs. AMFEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLAFX
TLAFX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TLAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TLAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFEX
AMFEX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AMFEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) and AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TLAFXAMFEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.55

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

4.84

-1.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.87

20.79

-5.92

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLAFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the AMFEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLAFX and AMFEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLAFXAMFEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

3.09

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.82

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.74

+0.03

Drawdowns

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLAFX drawdown since its inception was -33.94%, which is greater than AMFEX's maximum drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLAFX and AMFEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAFXAMFEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.94%

-30.41%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-6.07%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-15.23%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.72%

-21.21%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-4.31%

-1.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.41%

+0.52%

Volatility

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Core Fund (TLAFX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to AAMA Equity Fund (AMFEX) at 2.44%. This indicates that TLAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAFXAMFEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

2.44%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

7.17%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

9.52%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.50%

14.18%

+5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

16.95%

+2.52%

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLAFX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFEX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLAFX vs. AMFEX - Dividend Comparison

TLAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.24%, more than AMFEX's 10.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFEX
AAMA Equity Fund
10.58%11.99%9.19%0.92%4.82%0.22%0.44%0.78%0.83%0.00%
TLAFX
Transamerica Large Core Fund
14.24%15.89%23.39%7.88%6.40%16.53%9.17%1.44%22.85%4.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLAFX and AMFEX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLAFX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to AMFEX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLAFX dropped -33.94% vs AMFEX's -30.41%.

AMFEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLAFX and AMFEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer